Always Ultra Thin Pads with Wings
Waterproof backing raises concern; no public PFAS disclosure.
Always does not publicly disclose PFAS use or testing. Waterproof backings in absorbent products often use water-repellent treatments, some historically PFAS-based; current formulations remain opaque.
The better-graded swap
Seventh Generation
Seventh Generation Chlorine Free Maxi Pads
100/100 safety
Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
nonwoven polymer blend with waterproof backing layer
Lab data
No public lab test
You may also be interested in
Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.
- polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial growth in spent cartridges
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Aquasure
Premier Series 75 GPD Under Sink Reverse Osmosis Water Filtration System
- RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters
4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Avocado
Vegan Mattress
- organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Heavy metals
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
What Always Ultra Thin Pads with Wings is made of, ingredients and materials
Always Ultra Thin uses a nonwoven polymer blend (typically polypropylene and polyethylene fibers) bonded with adhesives, topped with a waterproof backing layer. The backing's composition is not publicly disclosed by Procter & Gamble, creating uncertainty about fluorochemical coatings or other water-resistance treatments. Nonwoven polymers themselves do not typically leach or degrade during normal use, but the adhesives and backing layer are the materials of concern for skin contact over extended wear periods.
What’s concerning
Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment
Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.
Category baseline
The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.
PFAS
Waterproof backing layers in disposable pads commonly use fluorochemical coatings to achieve water resistance. P&G discloses no PFAS testing or avoidance; industry practice suggests presence is probable but unconfirmed for this specific product.
Source, ATSDR ↗Adhesive skin sensitization
Nonwoven pads use pressure-sensitive adhesives (usually acrylics or rubber-based) to bond wings and layers. Individual sensitivity is documented in dermatologic literature; no specific Always product recall exists, but contact dermatitis is a known category risk.
Fragrance allergens (if scented variants)
Always offers scented versions with added fragrance compounds. Fragrance is a known vulvar sensitizer; unscented variants (also sold under Always brand) eliminate this exposure without changing other material hazards.
What’s reassuring
Microplastic or polymer fiber shedding
No established evidence that nonwoven polymer pads shed microplastics into vaginal or systemic tissues under normal use. Fibers are mechanically bonded, not designed to separate; no recalls or studies document this hazard for Always or comparable products.
Bleach residues or dioxins
Chlorine bleaching of cellulose layers can theoretically produce trace dioxins, but modern pad manufacturing typically uses oxygen or hydrogen peroxide bleaching. No public data or recalls confirm dioxin presence in Always pads.
How is this PFAS grade calculated?
The brand's record and disclosure
Procter & Gamble (Always parent company) does not publicly disclose PFAS content or use in menstrual products. The company has not pursued third-party certifications (e.g., OEKO-TEX, bluesign) that would verify chemical restrictions on period-care items. P&G has faced scrutiny on transparency in feminine hygiene but has not published a formal PFAS policy specific to this category. Industry-wide, period-pad manufacturers remain largely silent on waterproof backing composition.
How it compares in its category
Always Ultra Thin is a mass-market, mainstream product with no premium safety positioning. Certified organic or PFAS-tested alternatives (e.g., Cora, Rael, Aunt Flow) exist but at higher cost and sometimes lower availability. Always competes on absorbency and comfort rather than ingredient transparency. The waterproof backing is standard across most conventional pads but creates identical PFAS uncertainty across the market segment.
If you buy it
Change pads every 4-6 hours to minimize skin contact duration and moisture buildup, which can irritate vulvar tissue regardless of chemical content. Store in a cool, dry place to prevent moisture ingress into packaging. Do not flush; dispose in trash to avoid waterway contamination. If skin irritation, rashes, or odor develops, switch brands or consider reusable alternatives (cloth pads) to reduce overall exposure.
What is not known about PFAS in this product?
- Basis
- Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
- Lab test
- None on record for this exact product
- Brand statement
- Always has made a specific claim
Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.
What are the PFAS-free alternatives to Always Ultra Thin Pads with Wings?
- organic cotton, wood pulp
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Fragrance allergen content
- cellulose, cotton blend, absorbent core
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bleach residues and processing chemicals in cellulose
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
- Cotton, wood pulp absorbent core, plastic backing
- Pesticide residue
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
More period pads grades
How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.