PFAS25/ 100Poor
Overall0/ 100Bad
Always Extra Heavy Overnight Maxi Pads

Always · Period Pads

Always Extra Heavy Overnight Maxi Pads

Poor

Waterproof coating unspecified; PFAS risk unclear without transparency.

Verdict: SkipPFAS waterproof coating unspecified and brand silent on disclosure; other hazard profiles typical for category, but transparency gap warrants cautious use.

Always does not disclose PFAS status or waterproofing chemicals. Menstrual pads commonly use water-repellent coating treatments that may contain PFAS, but no lab data confirms presence in this product. Request detailed ingredient transparency from brand.

The safe swap

Playtex Sport Super+5

Playtex

Playtex Sport Super+5

70/100 safety

70Good

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Good.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

cellulose, absorbent core, plastic backing with unspecified waterproof coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

period care is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

75/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
🍳

Waterproof coating composition (unspecified)

The plastic backing's waterproof coating is not disclosed by Always; it may contain Teflon-type coating, polyurethane, or other compounds that could shed or leach under prolonged skin contact and moisture exposure. Without transparency, risk cannot be quantified.

70/ 100

Microfiber and plastic backing degradation

Menstrual pads shed microfibers from the plastic backing, particularly during use and storage. Long-term health effects of microfiber ingestion or inhalation remain under study, but the physical shedding is documented in product integrity assessments.

45/ 100
⛏️

Adhesive leachables

The adhesives binding the pad layers may contain unreacted monomers or plasticizers that can migrate into skin under warm, moist conditions. Composition is not publicly disclosed for this product.

70/ 100
🏷️

Contact dermatitis from undisclosed additives

Always Extra Heavy does not disclose whether the cellulose or plastic layers contain dyes, fragrances, antimicrobials, or antistatic agents. Individual sensitivity to these additives is common in menstrual product users, and lack of disclosure prevents pre-purchase assessment.

70/ 100
⚠️

Skin irritation from prolonged moisture barrier contact

The plastic backing creates an occlusive environment against skin, which can trap moisture and heat and promote bacterial growth and maceration. This is not unique to Always but is exacerbated by the overnight-use duration and thickness of this product.

20/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Always Extra Heavy Overnight uses a cellulose-based absorbent core (standard for the category) with a plastic backing layer and an unspecified waterproof coating. The coating is the primary concern: manufacturers typically use either Teflon-type coating-based coatings, polyurethane, or wax-based formulations to prevent leakage, but Always has not publicly disclosed which. Cellulose itself is low-risk, but the plastic backing and its adhesives can shed microfibers and may leach additives during prolonged moisture exposure against skin.

The brand's record and disclosure

Procter and Gamble (Always's parent company) has faced ongoing criticism for lack of transparency on PFAS and other chemical additives in menstrual products, but has not issued a public recall or safety warning specific to this product. The brand does not prominently disclose coating composition, flame retardants, or restricted chemical screening on product packaging or corporate materials. Industry-wide, Always is considered mainstream but less transparent than smaller brands with third-party certifications.

How it compares in its category

Always Extra Heavy Overnight sits in the mid-market segment: more affordable and widely available than certified organic alternatives (Seventh Generation, Cora), but less transparent than those competitors on chemical safety. Most mainstream pads (Kotex, Tampax) share similar disclosure gaps on coating composition. Products certified by organizations like the Cradle to Cradle or bearing the Leaping Bunny logo tend to offer higher chemical accountability, which Always Extra Heavy does not.

If you buy it

Change pads every 4-8 hours to minimize prolonged skin contact with the plastic backing and reduce microfiber exposure. Avoid storing in hot, humid environments (like bathrooms without ventilation) as moisture and heat can increase leaching from adhesives and coatings. If you experience irritation, itching, or rash, discontinue and consider a product with published ingredient transparency. Consider switching to certified or organic alternatives if you are sensitive to undisclosed chemical additives.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Always has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Period Pads

O.b Pro Comfort Super Plus 16 pad

OB

O.b Pro Comfort Super Plus 16 pad

rayon/viscose, cotton, and gelling polymers

PFAS Grade70Good
Overall Grade52Good
🫧

Microplastic shedding or degradation

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Irritation or allergic sensitization from adhesive or synthetic fibers

Moderate concern

45
⚠️

Bacterial growth or contamination from prolonged moisture

Limited concern

70

Lower concern. Typical period pad materials lack PFAS triggers.

Risky category by default

OB / Maternity Pad Maxi Super Absorbency NON241279

OB

/ Maternity Pad Maxi Super Absorbency NON241279

cellulose, polyethylene, absorbent core (typical period pad materials)

PFAS Grade70Good
Overall Grade44Poor
⚠️

Absorbent polymer (sodium polyacrylate) allergic sensitization

Limited concern

70
🫧

Polyethylene microplastic shedding

Limited concern

70

Bacterial colonization from prolonged wear

High concern

20

Lower concern, typical pad materials rarely require PFAS treatments.

Risky category by default

OC BON Ultra Thin Wings Sanitary Pads Medium 4P

OB

OC BON Ultra Thin Wings Sanitary Pads Medium 4P

Cellulose, nonwoven synthetics, adhesives

PFAS Grade70Good
Overall Grade62Good
⚠️

Adhesive contact sensitivity

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Bleaching residues in cellulose

Limited concern

70

Lower concern. No PFAS-prone materials publicly identified.

Risky category by default

More period pads grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.