PFAS25/ 100Poor
Overall0/ 100Bad
Always Maxi Overnight Pads with Wings

Always Maxi · Period Pads

Always Maxi Overnight Pads with Wings

Poor

Waterproof period pads often use PFAS-treated materials; brand provides no transparency.

Verdict: SkipPoor PFAS transparency combined with likely water-resistant coatings and undisclosed adhesives warrant cautious use; acceptable for occasional use but consider low-PFAS alternatives for regular long-term exposure.

Always does not disclose PFAS use or absence in these pads. Waterproof/absorbent period products commonly contain PFAS coatings for fluid barrier properties; independent testing data unavailable.

The safe swap

OC BON Ultra Thin Wings Sanitary Pads Medium 4P

OB

OC BON Ultra Thin Wings Sanitary Pads Medium 4P

70/100 safety

70Good

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Good.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

cellulose, polypropylene, adhesives with undisclosed water-resistant coatings

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

period care is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

75/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
🏷️

PFAS

Always does not disclose the chemical identity of water-resistant finishes on the backing and wings. Industry standard practice in overnight pads typically uses PFAS to achieve waterproofing; the brand's silence suggests either PFAS use or intentional non-disclosure, both concerning for reproductive-adjacent tissue exposure.

Source: ATSDR
20/ 100
🏷️

Undisclosed adhesives

The adhesives bonding cellulose, polypropylene, and nonwoven layers are not itemized on packaging or in public documentation. Adhesives may contain formaldehyde releasers, phenol, or other irritants; individual sensitivity varies widely, and without disclosure, users cannot screen for known allergens.

70/ 100
🫧

Polypropylene microparticle shedding

Polypropylene backing and wings can degrade, fragment, or shed microparticles during extended use (12+ hours) or if pad shifts. For an overnight pad worn for 8 to 12 hours in direct contact with skin, microscopic polypropylene fragments could theoretically transfer; long-term mucosal exposure data is limited.

70/ 100
🍳

Contact dermatitis from coating or adhesive compounds

Scattered consumer reports online describe skin irritation, rashes, or allergic reactions to Always Maxi pads; causation is not formally confirmed by the brand or independent testing, but sensitivity to coating resins, adhesives, or binding agents in conventional pads is documented in dermatology literature.

45/ 100
🏷️

Lack of transparency enabling informed choice

The absence of disclosed chemical composition, certifications, or PFAS statements prevents users from making risk-informed decisions about long-term menstrual product exposure. This is a systemic hazard in the period-care category, but Always' silence is notably more opaque than competitors publishing PFAS commitments.

20/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Always Maxi Overnight Pads use a cellulose-based absorbent core wrapped in polypropylene (plastic) backing and topped with a polyethylene or nonwoven layer, with adhesives binding the layers together. The undisclosed water-resistant coatings on the backing and wings are the primary concern: manufacturers in this category commonly use PFAS (PFAS "forever chemicals") to achieve water repellency, though Always has provided no public breakdown. Adhesives holding the pad together are not detailed in ingredient lists, meaning their chemical composition and potential leaching remain unknown to consumers. The polypropylene material itself is considered stable during use but the chemical treatments applied to it are opaque.

The brand's record and disclosure

Procter and Gamble (Always' parent company) has remained silent on PFAS use in menstrual products despite growing industry scrutiny. The brand does not publish material safety data sheets or third-party certifications (such as Cradle to Cradle or OEKO-TEX) specific to this product line. No major recalls have been publicly linked to Always period pads for chemical hazards, though the absence of recalls does not confirm absence of hazard. P&G has faced general criticism for lack of transparency on 'forever chemicals' in personal care products.

How it compares in its category

Most conventional period pads use similar cellulose-polypropylene construction; Always is neither worse nor better than Kotex, Tampax, or store brands in material class. However, brands like Seventh Generation, Cora, and Orbit have publicly committed to PFAS-free or significantly reduced fluorochemical water-resistant layers, offering clearer safety positioning. Always Maxi Overnight is marketed for heavy absorbency and 12-hour protection, meaning it is designed for extended contact; this increases potential cumulative exposure to any chemicals in the backing and adhesives. Few period pads in the mainstream market carry rigorous third-party chemical certification.

If you buy it

Change pads every 3 to 4 hours during waking use or every 8 hours overnight to minimize prolonged contact with coating materials and adhesives; do not exceed 12 hours as marketed. Store unopened pads in a cool, dry place away from direct heat, as heat can accelerate any potential leaching of adhesive or coating components. If you experience unexplained skin irritation, itching, or allergic reactions, discontinue use and consider switching to a brand with published PFAS-free or hypoallergenic certification. Review your pad use over a year; if you use these regularly, exploring PFAS-transparent alternatives is prudent for long-term peace of mind.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Always Maxi has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Period Pads

O.b Pro Comfort Super Plus 16 pad

OB

O.b Pro Comfort Super Plus 16 pad

rayon/viscose, cotton, and gelling polymers

PFAS Grade70Good
Overall Grade52Good
🫧

Microplastic shedding or degradation

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Irritation or allergic sensitization from adhesive or synthetic fibers

Moderate concern

45
⚠️

Bacterial growth or contamination from prolonged moisture

Limited concern

70

Lower concern. Typical period pad materials lack PFAS triggers.

Risky category by default

OB / Maternity Pad Maxi Super Absorbency NON241279

OB

/ Maternity Pad Maxi Super Absorbency NON241279

cellulose, polyethylene, absorbent core (typical period pad materials)

PFAS Grade70Good
Overall Grade44Poor
⚠️

Absorbent polymer (sodium polyacrylate) allergic sensitization

Limited concern

70
🫧

Polyethylene microplastic shedding

Limited concern

70

Bacterial colonization from prolonged wear

High concern

20

Lower concern, typical pad materials rarely require PFAS treatments.

Risky category by default

OC BON Ultra Thin Wings Sanitary Pads Medium 4P

OB

OC BON Ultra Thin Wings Sanitary Pads Medium 4P

Cellulose, nonwoven synthetics, adhesives

PFAS Grade70Good
Overall Grade62Good
⚠️

Adhesive contact sensitivity

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Bleaching residues in cellulose

Limited concern

70

Lower concern. No PFAS-prone materials publicly identified.

Risky category by default

More period pads grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.