PFAS25/ 100Poor
Overall3/ 100Bad
Always Maxi Pads With Wings

Always Maxi · Period Pads

Always Maxi Pads With Wings

Poor

Unknown waterproof coating; brand silent on PFAS. Limited public data.

Verdict: SkipPFAS in waterproof coating is unconfirmed but probable; other hazard data sparse. Use with awareness of coating unknowns.

Always pads use waterproof treatments to prevent leakage, but the brand does not disclose PFAS use or test results. Material composition remains opaque to consumers.

The safe swap

Tampax Super 48 Units

Tampax

Tampax Super 48 Units

70/100 safety

70Good

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Good.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

cellulose/polyethylene with waterproof coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

period care is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

75/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Coating chemistry is proprietary and undisclosed. PFAS are common in menstrual product waterproof layers; Always provides no public assurance of PFAS absence. Direct skin contact over hours increases potential for dermal absorption of coating constituents.

Source: ATSDR
70/ 100
🫧

Microplastics

Polyethylene backing may shed microscopic particles during normal flexing, stretching, and friction against skin. No data exist on particle size, quantity, or systemic uptake from this specific product, but mechanical degradation is inherent to the material class.

Source: EPA
70/ 100
🏷️

Undisclosed synthetic additives in coating

Proprietary waterproof coatings often contain plasticizers, adhesion promoters, or cross-linking agents not listed on packaging. Without ingredient transparency, risk of skin sensitization or irritation from specific additives cannot be ruled out, particularly for sensitive or reactive skin.

70/ 100
⚠️

Adhesive and fragrance sensitization

Always Maxi pads contain adhesive and optional fragrance (in some variants). Fragrance and adhesive components are known triggers for vulvovaginal irritation and contact dermatitis in susceptible users; unscented variants may reduce risk.

45/ 100

What’s reassuring

Bleach residue in cellulose core

Always pads do not claim to be unbleached. Standard cellulose bleaching uses chlorine-based agents, but regulatory limits apply and no published recalls or complaints specific to residual bleach in Always products are on record. Risk is not established but is lower than in older product generations.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Always Maxi pads are constructed from a cellulose-based absorbent core with polyethylene backing and a waterproof coating layer. The coating's chemical identity is not publicly disclosed by Procter & Gamble (Always's parent company), which is the primary safety concern. Cellulose itself is low-risk, but polyethylene can shed microparticles with repeated friction, and undisclosed waterproof coatings commonly contain PFAS or other synthetic polymers that may leach into skin contact areas over wear time.

The brand's record and disclosure

Procter & Gamble does not publicly disclose the specific chemical composition of Always pad coatings or provide third-party safety certifications specific to PFAS avoidance. The company has faced periodic criticism for opacity on feminine-care product ingredients but has not issued product-specific recalls for chemical hazards in this line. No independent lab testing results on Always Maxi pads for PFAS or heavy metals appear in published peer-reviewed literature, leaving assessment dependent on material class patterns rather than brand-specific data.

How it compares in its category

Period pads vary widely in coating transparency and PFAS risk. Organic/unbleached brands (Seventh Generation, Cora, Rael) typically disclose materials and often avoid PFAS-prone coatings, while mainstream brands including Always, Kotex, and Tampax rarely publish full ingredient lists for synthetic components. Always Maxi occupies the mid-market space with no meaningful transparency advantage; budget and performance are competitive, but chemical safety claims are absent across the category, making comparison difficult.

If you buy it

Replace pads every 4-6 hours as directed; extended wear does not increase chemical exposure risk acutely but may increase skin irritation. Store in a cool, dry place away from heat sources; high temperatures do not typically activate leaching from polyethylene, but prolonged sun exposure in vehicles should be avoided. If you experience unexplained rashes, itching, or chemical odors, switch products and consider a dermatologist consultation. Monitor for product discontinuation or recall notices via FDA's database.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Always Maxi has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Period Pads

O.b Pro Comfort Super Plus 16 pad

OB

O.b Pro Comfort Super Plus 16 pad

rayon/viscose, cotton, and gelling polymers

PFAS Grade70Good
Overall Grade52Good
🫧

Microplastic shedding or degradation

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Irritation or allergic sensitization from adhesive or synthetic fibers

Moderate concern

45
⚠️

Bacterial growth or contamination from prolonged moisture

Limited concern

70

Lower concern. Typical period pad materials lack PFAS triggers.

Risky category by default

OB / Maternity Pad Maxi Super Absorbency NON241279

OB

/ Maternity Pad Maxi Super Absorbency NON241279

cellulose, polyethylene, absorbent core (typical period pad materials)

PFAS Grade70Good
Overall Grade44Poor
⚠️

Absorbent polymer (sodium polyacrylate) allergic sensitization

Limited concern

70
🫧

Polyethylene microplastic shedding

Limited concern

70

Bacterial colonization from prolonged wear

High concern

20

Lower concern, typical pad materials rarely require PFAS treatments.

Risky category by default

OC BON Ultra Thin Wings Sanitary Pads Medium 4P

OB

OC BON Ultra Thin Wings Sanitary Pads Medium 4P

Cellulose, nonwoven synthetics, adhesives

PFAS Grade70Good
Overall Grade62Good
⚠️

Adhesive contact sensitivity

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Bleaching residues in cellulose

Limited concern

70

Lower concern. No PFAS-prone materials publicly identified.

Risky category by default

More period pads grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.