PFAS25/ 100Poor
Overall0/ 100Bad
Always Maxi Size 3 Extra Long Super Pads with Wings

Always Maxi · Period Pads

Always Maxi Size 3 Extra Long Super Pads with Wings

Poor

Unknown waterproof backing treatment; PFAS risk unspecified by brand

Verdict: SkipPFAS in waterproof backing is the primary concern; other hazard data sparse but standard. Use if needed, seek transparent alternatives when possible.

Menstrual pads typically use waterproof backings that may contain PFAS, but Always discloses no information. No third-party testing or certifications available for this product.

The safe swap

Tampax Super 48 Units

Tampax

Tampax Super 48 Units

70/100 safety

70Good

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Good.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

absorbent core, adhesive, waterproof backing (unknown treatment)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

period care is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

75/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Waterproof polymer coatings on period pads commonly use fluorinated compounds (PFAS) to achieve water resistance. Always does not disclose backing treatment; PFAS detection in similar products is well-documented in scientific literature, and the brand's silence on this ingredient is consistent with industry-wide non-disclosure.

Source: ATSDR
20/ 100
⛏️

Adhesive leachables and skin contact sensitivity

The adhesive strip in Always Maxi comes into direct contact with vulvar skin, one of the body's most permeable barriers. Adhesive formulations are proprietary and not publicly detailed; acrylate-based adhesives can cause irritation in sensitive individuals, but no specific adverse-event signal has been established for Always Maxi pads in epidemiological data.

70/ 100
⚠️

Fragrance allergens in scented variants

Always offers scented versions of Maxi pads; fragrance formulations are not disclosed. Scented period products have been flagged by dermatologists and gynecologists for potential irritation in sensitive users, though causality studies are limited. Unscented variants eliminate this risk.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Absorbent material degradation and particles

The superabsorbent polymer (SAP) core is widely used in menstrual and incontinence products and has no established safety issues under normal use conditions. However, if the pad degrades or is overused, microparticle release is theoretically possible; no recalls or documented incidents exist for Always Maxi.

95/ 100

Bacterial or fungal growth from prolonged wear or moisture retention

No inherent design flaw or material issue has been documented. Risk is user-behavior dependent (wear duration, moisture environment). Always Maxi absorbency is standard for the category and does not elevate microbiological risk versus peers.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Always Maxi pads use a multi-layer absorbent core (typically wood pulp and superabsorbent polymer SAP), an adhesive strip for fastening, and a waterproof backing layer. The backing is the key unknown: it likely contains a polymer film or coating to prevent leakage, and the waterproof treatment often relies on PFAS compounds (per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances) to achieve water resistance. The absorbent layers themselves are generally recognized as safe in dermatological use, but the synthetic chemicals in backing and adhesive are not publicly disclosed by Always.

The brand's record and disclosure

Procter and Gamble (Always parent company) has not published specific ingredient lists or safety certifications for period-pad formulations, nor has it committed to PFAS-free manufacturing in this category. The brand remains silent on waterproof backing treatment chemistry. No major recalls or adverse-event patterns have been established for Always Maxi pads in public health databases. Competitors including Kotex and Tampax similarly lack transparency on PFAS content in period products.

How it compares in its category

Most mainstream period pads (Always, Kotex, Tampax, Stayfree) share the same opacity around waterproof backing chemistry. Organic or eco-marketed alternatives (Seventh Generation, Veeda, Natracare) often advertise PFAS-free or reduced-chemical backing, though independent verification is rare. Always Maxi is competitively standard in absorbency and leak protection but lags in transparency; it occupies the mass-market middle without premium safety claims.

If you buy it

Use pads as directed and replace as needed; there is no "care" protocol for the user. Store in a cool, dry place to prevent adhesive degradation or material breakdown. Discontinue use immediately if skin irritation, rash, or unusual odor develops (possible sign of adhesive or backing breakdown). If concerned about PFAS exposure, consider brands that publicly commit to PFAS-free waterproof technologies or biodegradable backings.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Always Maxi has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Period Pads

O.b Pro Comfort Super Plus 16 pad

OB

O.b Pro Comfort Super Plus 16 pad

rayon/viscose, cotton, and gelling polymers

PFAS Grade70Good
Overall Grade52Good
🫧

Microplastic shedding or degradation

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Irritation or allergic sensitization from adhesive or synthetic fibers

Moderate concern

45
⚠️

Bacterial growth or contamination from prolonged moisture

Limited concern

70

Lower concern. Typical period pad materials lack PFAS triggers.

Risky category by default

OB / Maternity Pad Maxi Super Absorbency NON241279

OB

/ Maternity Pad Maxi Super Absorbency NON241279

cellulose, polyethylene, absorbent core (typical period pad materials)

PFAS Grade70Good
Overall Grade44Poor
⚠️

Absorbent polymer (sodium polyacrylate) allergic sensitization

Limited concern

70
🫧

Polyethylene microplastic shedding

Limited concern

70

Bacterial colonization from prolonged wear

High concern

20

Lower concern, typical pad materials rarely require PFAS treatments.

Risky category by default

OC BON Ultra Thin Wings Sanitary Pads Medium 4P

OB

OC BON Ultra Thin Wings Sanitary Pads Medium 4P

Cellulose, nonwoven synthetics, adhesives

PFAS Grade70Good
Overall Grade62Good
⚠️

Adhesive contact sensitivity

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Bleaching residues in cellulose

Limited concern

70

Lower concern. No PFAS-prone materials publicly identified.

Risky category by default

More period pads grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.