PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
Columbia Men's Ascender Softshell Jacket

Columbia · Softshell Jackets

Columbia Men's Ascender Softshell Jacket

Bad

Avoid until Columbia reveals water-repellent coating chemistry; softshell jackets commonly use PFAS-based water treatments.

Verdict: SkipPFAS chemistry undisclosed and likely present in water-repellent coating finish; no other major hazards documented. Buy only if you accept fluorochemical exposure risk and contact Columbia for transparency.

Columbia's softshell has a water-repellent coating finish, a major PFAS risk pathway, but the brand makes no public disclosure of whether it uses PFAS-free alternatives like wax or fluorine-free coatings. No third-party testing exists.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Softshell fabric with water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent treatments have historically contained PFAS chemicals.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

PFAS exposure happens more often with clothing products.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Softshell jackets commonly rely on PFAS-based fluorochemical water-repellent coating coatings. Columbia has not disclosed the chemistry for Ascender Softshell water-repellent coating, and industry practice suggests standard PFAS use is probable.

Source: ATSDR
20/ 100
⚠️

Fragrance or skin irritants from water-repellent coating application

Some users report mild skin irritation or odor from newly purchased water-repellent apparel, likely from residual water-repellent coating chemistry or solvents. Rinsing and airing before wear can reduce this risk.

70/ 100

water-repellent coating degradation and reapplication necessity

water-repellent coating finishes degrade with washing and wear. Reapplication typically required every 1-2 years; commercial water-repellent coating products often contain PFAS, creating a repeated exposure loop if not replaced with fluorocarbon-free alternatives.

45/ 100

What’s reassuring

💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No recalls or documented reports of formaldehyde resin or problematic azo dyes in Columbia Ascender Softshell. Base synthetics are standard. Risk exists at industry level but is not specific to this product.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

Antimony in polyester fiber

Polyester may contain antimony as a polymerization catalyst, but levels in finished apparel are typically low and not subject to regulatory concern. No reports specific to Columbia Ascender.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Columbia's Ascender Softshell uses a synthetic softshell fabric (typically polyester or nylon blend) with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish applied to the outer layer. The water-repellent coating is what makes this jacket water-resistant, but that finish is the primary concern: industry standard practice uses PFAS-based fluorochemicals for water-repellent coating durability, though some brands now offer PFAS-free alternatives. Columbia has not disclosed whether this specific jacket uses PFAS or fluorocarbon-free water-repellent coating chemistry. The base softshell fabric itself (polyester/nylon) carries minimal intrinsic hazard when worn as-is.

The brand's record and disclosure

Columbia Sportswear has not published a public commitment to eliminate PFAS from apparel or a transparency report on water-repellent coating chemistry in their product lines. The brand does not list PFAS-free certifications (such as Bluesign or OEKO-TEX) for the Ascender Softshell on product pages. Columbia is a large, established outdoor brand but has remained largely silent on PFAS phase-out timelines compared to competitors like Patagonia or Arc'teryx, which have begun disclosing water-repellent coating alternatives.

How it compares in its category

Most mainstream softshell jackets in this price and performance range (including from North Face, Marmot, and similar brands) use conventional PFAS-based water-repellent coating finishes unless explicitly marked otherwise. Premium competitors (Patagonia, Arc'teryx) increasingly offer PFAS-free or limited-fluorochemical options but at higher cost. Columbia's Ascender is positioned as an accessible outdoor layer, which typically correlates with standard water-repellent coating chemistry rather than costly alternatives. Without disclosure, this product sits at the category norm rather than a leader or laggard on chemical transparency.

If you buy it

Wash the jacket separately from other clothing in cold water the first 2-3 times to rinse any loose fluorochemical residue. Avoid machine drying at high heat; air dry to preserve the water-repellent coating. Reapply water-repellent coating treatments when water beads no longer form on the fabric (typically every 1-2 years depending on use); consider requesting PFAS-free reapplication products when available. Contact Columbia customer service directly to ask whether this model uses PFAS-based or fluorocarbon-free water-repellent coating; documented answers will inform future purchases.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Columbia has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Softshell Jackets

Patagonia Men's R2 TechFace Hoody

Patagonia

Men's R2 TechFace Hoody

Polyester shell with water-repellent coating treatment

PFAS Grade65Good
Good

Lower concern, Patagonia's public PFAS phase-out and explicit Teflon-type coating-free claim support this choice.

Bluesign®

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

More softshell jackets grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.