PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall12/ 100Bad
Columbia Men's Tall Heights III Hooded Softshell Jacket

Columbia · Softshell Jackets

Columbia Men's Tall Heights III Hooded Softshell Jacket

Bad

Avoid until Columbia discloses water-repellent coating chemistry or certifies PFAS-free.

Verdict: SkipPolyester softshell with undisclosed water-repellent coating poses unquantified PFAS risk; no other documented hazards, but Columbia's silence on chemistry warrants cautious use and care.

This softshell includes polyester with a water-repellent coating treatment typical of outdoor jackets, but Columbia doesn't publicly disclose whether the coating contains PFAS or alternatives. The risk remains unquantified.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Polyester shell with water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent treatments have historically contained PFAS chemicals.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

PFAS exposure happens more often with clothing products.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

PFAS

water-repellent coating finish chemistry is undisclosed by Columbia. Industry standard has historically been PFAS-based; non-fluorinated alternatives now exist but are not confirmed for this model. Potential for bioaccumulation if jacket sheds coating particles or water-off residues into environment.

Source: ATSDR
70/ 100
💨

VOC off-gassing from coating and adhesives

New synthetic textiles may emit volatile organic compounds during initial use, particularly if stored in warm conditions. This is typically mild and resolves within days of airing out. No concentration data specific to this jacket is available.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Azo dyes in polyester

Columbia polyester typically undergoes restricted azo dye screening for commercial textiles. No specific safety incidents or failures reported for this jacket. Standard textile manufacturing controls apply.

95/ 100

Antimony catalyst residues in polyester

Polyester synthesis uses antimony oxide as a catalyst; residual levels in finished fiber are typically minimal and not bioavailable. Columbia products have not been flagged for elevated antimony content in independent testing.

95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Modern softshell finishing does not typically require formaldehyde-based resins. Columbia does not disclose formaldehyde use for this product line, and no regulatory action or complaint history exists.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This jacket uses a polyester shell with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish. water-repellent coating coatings historically relied on fluorochemicals (PFAS) to repel water, though some newer formulations use non-fluorinated alternatives. Columbia has not publicly disclosed which chemistry is used in this specific model. Polyester itself is chemically stable and poses minimal hazard; the concern is entirely in the surface treatment and whether fluorinated compounds are present.

The brand's record and disclosure

Columbia has not made a public commitment to PFAS-free water-repellent coating or disclosed specific fluorochemical use across its product line. The company remains silent on whether this jacket uses legacy PFAS-based water repellents or newer non-fluorinated alternatives. No recalls or safety controversies specific to Columbia softshells have been documented. This lack of transparency is unusual for outdoor brands that market to environmentally conscious consumers.

How it compares in its category

Many major outdoor brands (Patagonia, Arc'teryx, The North Face) now offer PFAS-free or fluorocarbon-free water-repellent coating options with full disclosure. Columbia's Tall Heights III sits in the mid-range price segment but does not benefit from transparent sourcing or third-party certification of water-repellent coating chemistry. In this category, equivalent jackets with certified PFAS-free water repellency or non-fluorinated treatments are available, making the lack of disclosure a relative disadvantage.

If you buy it

Wash infrequently and use cool water to extend water-repellent coating life and minimize any potential leaching. Avoid high heat (dryers, irons) which can degrade coatings and potentially volatilize surface chemicals. After 2-3 years of regular use, water-repellent coating typically fails and reapplication requires purchasing aftermarket treatments (which may also contain PFAS). Store in a cool, dry place away from direct sunlight to slow coating degradation.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Columbia has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Softshell Jackets

Patagonia Men's R2 TechFace Hoody

Patagonia

Men's R2 TechFace Hoody

Polyester shell with water-repellent coating treatment

PFAS Grade65Good
Good

Lower concern, Patagonia's public PFAS phase-out and explicit Teflon-type coating-free claim support this choice.

Bluesign®

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

More softshell jackets grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.