PFAS25/ 100Poor
Overall0/ 100Bad
Eco Friendly Coffee Take Out Container

· Food Packaging

Eco Friendly Coffee Take Out Container

Poor

Skip until coating is revealed; compostable fiber containers often use PFAS-based water barriers.

Verdict · SkipUnspecified water-resistant coating likely contains PFAS; fiber-based food contact risk without material transparency or independent certification.

Containers require water-resistant coatings to prevent fluid leakage, yet the coating remains unspecified. Many commercial compostable containers rely on PFAS-based barriers.

The better-graded swap

Bagasse PFAS-Free Food Containers

Bagasse

Bagasse PFAS-Free Food Containers

95/100 safety

95Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Compostable fiber-based container with unspecified water-resistant coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What Eco Friendly Coffee Take Out Container is made of, ingredients and materials

This container is fiber-based (likely bleached kraft paper or molded fiber pulp) with an undisclosed water-resistant coating. Fiber alone is porous and unsuitable for hot or greasy foods, so manufacturers add barriers, typically either wax, polyethylene, or PFAS-based fluorinated coatings. The brand has not publicly specified which approach the brand uses. Without this disclosure, the safety profile cannot be reliably assessed.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

75/ 100
♾️

Vague safety claims only

Uses vague language ("eco-friendly", "clean") without a specific PFAS statement.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Fiber-based food containers commonly use PFAS Teflon-family coating coatings for grease and water resistance. The brand's silence on this topic and lack of public material disclosure is consistent with unrevealed PFAS use; migration into hot or fatty foods is an established migration pathway.

Source, ATSDR ↗
20/ 100
🫧

Coating degradation and microparticle release

Unknown coating composition means inability to assess durability. Degraded or poorly bonded coatings can flake into food, especially during heating or with acidic beverages. Without material specifications, durability cannot be verified.

70/ 100
⛏️

Leaching from unspecified additives in pulp

Fiber pulp may contain bleach residues (chlorine compounds), sizing agents, or processing aids not fully removed. Food-contact fiber containers are not consistently regulated for trace chemical residues; The brand provides no testing data.

70/ 100
⚠️

Bacterial growth if reused or stored wet

Fiber containers absorb moisture, creating an environment for microbial growth if rinsed and reused. These are designed for single-use, but compostable marketing may encourage reuse without clear guidance.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

⛏️

Heavy metals

No recalls or documented contamination for this brand are on record. However, exterior printing inks on food-contact containers should be food-safe; without certification (e.g., FDA Title 21 CFR 178 compliance) this cannot be confirmed for this product.

Source, FDA ↗
95/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

The brand offers no public material specification sheet, coating composition, or third-party testing documentation on their website or packaging. The brand's silence on PFAS specifically, combined with the material category (food-contact fiber containers), aligns with an industry-wide pattern of PFAS use in compostable food packaging that is not voluntarily disclosed. No independent certifications from NSF, FDA compliance letters, or compostability standards with hazard limits are on record.

How it compares in its category

Fiber-based compostable containers are marketed as eco-friendly but rank lower in food safety transparency than rigid plastic or aluminum alternatives, which typically carry detailed material certifications. Competitors such as Vegware or Footprint publish full coating information (e.g., PHA-based or wax barriers); The brand does not. This lack of disclosure places it below industry leaders on the safety and trust spectrum for a single-use food contact application.

If you buy it

Do not heat this container in a microwave or use for hot liquids above 60 degrees Celsius without confirming the coating stability from the manufacturer. If you do purchase, contact directly and request a material safety data sheet (MSDS) or coating specification before use with hot beverages. Inspect for visible coating degradation (peeling, brittleness) before each use. Store in cool, dry conditions away from moisture and oils to prevent premature breakdown.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 32% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

What are the PFAS-free alternatives to Eco Friendly Coffee Take Out Container?

Matter Compostable Food Storage Container 5ct

Matter

Compostable Food Storage Container 5ct

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ BPI Certified Compostable
  • Plant-based fiber pulp (compostable)
  • A third party reports verifying it as PFAS-free
  • Microbe/mold growth if stored damp

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Eco Products WorldView Compostable Take-Out Containers EP-SCRC32

Eco-Products

Eco Products WorldView Compostable Take-Out Containers EP-SCRC32

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ BPI Certified Compostable
  • Plant-based fiber (compostable sugarcane bagasse)
  • A third party reports verifying it as PFAS-free
  • Bleaching agents and processing residues

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Eco-Products WorldView Sugarcane Take-Out Containers

Eco-Products

WorldView Sugarcane Take-Out Containers

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ BPI Certified Compostable
  • Sugarcane bagasse (post-consumer fiber)
  • A third party reports verifying it as PFAS-free
  • Cellulose fiber degradation and food contact

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

More food packaging grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.