PFAS25/ 100Poor
Overall7/ 100Bad
Capri Plus OB Pads - Mini

OB · Period Pads

Capri Plus OB Pads - Mini

Poor

Typical pad construction; waterproof layer raises concern, no brand disclosure.

Verdict: SkipPFAS waterproofing is the main concern; cellulose core is safe, but OB's silence on composition and chemicals warrants cautious use with frequent pad changes.

OB does not disclose PFAS or coating composition. Standard period pads use moisture-barrier treatments that may contain PFAS, though no lab data available for this product specifically.

The safe swap

Nannopad Pad Feminine Multipack

Nana

Nannopad Pad Feminine Multipack

70/100 safety

70Good

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Good.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Cellulose/wood pulp core with adhesive; leak-guard likely polymer-based

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

period care is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

75/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Industry testing has confirmed PFAS in period pad waterproof layers; OB's Capri Plus does not disclose whether its leak-guard uses PFAS, phthalates, or other polymers. This is graded separately but represents the single largest chemical exposure point in this product.

Source: ATSDR
45/ 100
⚠️

Adhesive contact dermatitis or sensitization

Acrylate-based adhesives in pads can rarely trigger allergic contact dermatitis with prolonged or repeated skin contact, especially in individuals with sensitive skin. No specific recall or high-incident data exists for OB Capri Plus, but this is a known category-wide risk if adhesive formulation is not carefully managed.

70/ 100
⚠️

Fragrance or cosmetic additives in the pad material

Capri Plus Mini pads are described as unscented on packaging, reducing fragrance allergen risk compared to scented variants. However, ingredient disclosure is absent, so the presence of any fragrance compounds or masking agents cannot be verified independently.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Microplastic or polymer particle shedding

No data suggests that Capri Plus pads shed microplastics or polymer fragments during normal use. Degradation risk is low under typical storage and use conditions, though poor storage (extreme heat, moisture) could theoretically degrade polymer coatings over years.

95/ 100

Dioxins or chlorine bleaching byproducts in cellulose

Cellulose pulp in pads is typically bleached, and historical concern about dioxin contamination was addressed by industry shifts away from chlorine bleaching decades ago. Current period pads, including OB, are not known to contain dioxins at detectable levels, though OB does not publicly confirm their bleaching process.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Capri Plus Mini pads use a cellulose/wood pulp absorbent core, which is a low-toxicity natural material with no known chemical leaching risk during normal use. The adhesive layer and leak-guard polymer layer are the chemical exposure points; typical pad adhesives are acrylate-based and generally regarded as safe at skin contact levels, but the waterproof polymer backing often contains PFAS compounds to repel menstrual fluid and prevent leaks. OB has not publicly disclosed the specific polymers or chemical treatments used in their leak-guard layer.

The brand's record and disclosure

OB (Edgewell Personal Care) does not publish ingredient lists or material composition for their pads on product packaging or websites, which is standard in the period-care industry but limits consumer verification. No public recalls or safety controversies are recorded for Capri Plus pads. The brand has not made statements on PFAS use, chemical testing, or certification by third-party safety organizations, meaning there is no transparent evidence of either risk mitigation or high standards.

How it compares in its category

Most conventional pad brands use similar cellulose cores and polymer waterproof layers, making Capri Plus typical rather than distinctive for chemical safety. Organic cotton pads and pads certified by groups like Cradle to Cradle or European Ecolabel may disclose more about chemical treatments, though they cost more. OB Pads offer no claimed advantage in reduced chemical exposure compared to mainstream competitors like Always or Kotex.

If you buy it

Change pads every 4 to 6 hours to minimize prolonged skin contact with polymer layers and any residual chemical compounds; this is standard hygiene regardless of brand. Avoid wearing pads in very hot conditions (heavy exercise, prolonged high heat) where polymer breakdown or leaching risk could theoretically increase, though no specific risk data exists for pads. If you notice skin irritation, rash, or odor changes, switch brands and note whether symptoms resolve; this would suggest a reaction to this product's adhesive or polymer formulation rather than the cellulose core.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 42% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
OB has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Period Pads

O.b Pro Comfort Super Plus 16 pad

OB

O.b Pro Comfort Super Plus 16 pad

rayon/viscose, cotton, and gelling polymers

PFAS Grade70Good
Overall Grade52Good
🫧

Microplastic shedding or degradation

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Irritation or allergic sensitization from adhesive or synthetic fibers

Moderate concern

45
⚠️

Bacterial growth or contamination from prolonged moisture

Limited concern

70

Lower concern. Typical period pad materials lack PFAS triggers.

Risky category by default

OB / Maternity Pad Maxi Super Absorbency NON241279

OB

/ Maternity Pad Maxi Super Absorbency NON241279

cellulose, polyethylene, absorbent core (typical period pad materials)

PFAS Grade70Good
Overall Grade44Poor
⚠️

Absorbent polymer (sodium polyacrylate) allergic sensitization

Limited concern

70
🫧

Polyethylene microplastic shedding

Limited concern

70

Bacterial colonization from prolonged wear

High concern

20

Lower concern, typical pad materials rarely require PFAS treatments.

Risky category by default

OC BON Ultra Thin Wings Sanitary Pads Medium 4P

OB

OC BON Ultra Thin Wings Sanitary Pads Medium 4P

Cellulose, nonwoven synthetics, adhesives

PFAS Grade70Good
Overall Grade62Good
⚠️

Adhesive contact sensitivity

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Bleaching residues in cellulose

Limited concern

70

Lower concern. No PFAS-prone materials publicly identified.

Risky category by default

More period pads grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.