PFAS70/ 100Good
Overall52/ 100Good
OXO POP Container Baking Set

OXO · Food Storage Containers

OXO POP Container Baking Set

Good

Lower concern; basic plastic food storage without known PFAS triggers, but OXO provides no transparency on coatings or treatments.

Verdict: BuyOXO POP containers are polypropylene/polycarbonate food storage with no documented toxicity issues; standard plastic food-contact safety applies with normal use precautions.

OXO POP containers are rigid plastic storage with snap-lock lids designed for dry goods. The main risk factors like nonstick coatings, water-repellent treatments, and stain-resistant finishes don't typically appear in basic food-storage canisters. OXO makes no public disclosure about PFAS or coating chemistry.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

Plastic (polypropylene/polycarbonate) food storage containers and lids

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

PFAS exposure happens more often with clothing products.

75/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
🫧

Microplastic shedding from wear

Repeated opening/closing and hand-washing can cause fine plastic particles to detach from the container edges and seals over time, especially if lids are used roughly or stored in damp conditions. Risk is low with normal use but increases with product age.

70/ 100

Lead

OXO POP lids use silicone or rubber gaskets that can crack, shrink, or lose elasticity after 3-5 years of use or exposure to dishwasher heat. A compromised seal allows moisture and contaminants to enter stored foods, especially in baking mixes prone to absorbing humidity.

Source: ATSDR
70/ 100
⚠️

Chemical absorption and odor/flavor transfer

Polypropylene absorbs volatile compounds from strong-smelling foods and cleaning products over time. OXO containers are not immune to this; extended storage of spiced or acidic foods may leave persistent odors and taste residue in the plastic, though no toxicity results directly.

45/ 100

What’s reassuring

Safe base material

Made from ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber with no PFAS risk.

100/ 100
🍼

BPA & bisphenols

OXO has not disclosed whether lids contain BPA or BPS. Polycarbonate used in some OXO lids may have carried BPA in older formulations, but modern batches are assumed BPA-free by industry standard. No leaching incidents are documented for this product line.

Source: FDA
95/ 100

Phthalate plasticizers

Polypropylene does not require phthalates for flexibility. If polycarbonate or acrylic is used in lids or seals, phthalates are unlikely in food-contact formulations subject to FDA oversight, but OXO does not confirm absence.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The OXO POP Baking Set uses polypropylene (PP) for the main containers and polycarbonate (PC) or acrylic for lids/seals. Polypropylene is one of the safest plastics for food contact because it has a high melting point (around 130°C / 266°F) and does not leach BPA or phthalates under normal kitchen conditions. Polycarbonate, if present in lids, carries older concerns about bisphenol A (BPA), though modern OXO products typically use BPA-free formulations, though the company does not publicly specify this for all lines.

The brand's record and disclosure

OXO is a subsidiary of Helen of Troy and has a reputation for practical, durable kitchen products. The company has not published comprehensive chemical disclosure statements or third-party certifications (such as NSF or FDA compliance documentation) readily available to consumers. No major recalls or contamination incidents specific to the POP container line are documented in public safety databases. OXO remains silent on PFAS treatments or coatings, which is typical for mainstream food storage brands but leaves a transparency gap.

How it compares in its category

OXO POP containers occupy the mid-range of the food storage market. They are more affordable than glass alternatives and more durable than thin single-use plastics, but offer less transparency than premium brands like Pyrex (glass) or Rubbermaid Brilliance (which publishes material specs). Compared to budget PP containers, OXO's design and seal quality are notably stronger, reducing the risk of lid degradation and microparticle release over time.

If you buy it

Do not microwave these containers unless the label explicitly permits it; polycarbonate lids can degrade under heat. Store dry goods (flour, sugar, baking supplies) rather than acidic or fatty foods for extended periods, as plastics can absorb odors and flavors. Hand-wash with warm water and mild soap; avoid abrasive scrubbers that scratch the surface. Replace containers every 3-5 years or if lids no longer seal tightly, as wear can compromise freshness and invite microbial growth.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
OXO has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Food Storage Containers

Pyrex Glass Meal Prep Set

Pyrex

Glass Meal Prep Set

borosilicate glass with metal lids (likely stainless steel or aluminum)

PFAS Grade95Excellent
Overall Grade71Good
⛏️

Metal lid corrosion and leaching

Limited concern

70

Silicone or rubber gasket degradation

Moderate concern

45
⚠️

Thermal shock fracture from glass

Moderate concern

45

Lower PFAS concern; glass meal prep containers are inherently a safer material choice.

Risky category by default

Pyrex Freshlock 10-Piece Glass Storage Set

Pyrex

Freshlock 10-Piece Glass Storage Set

Borosilicate glass containers with plastic lids (PP/TPE closure material unspecified)

PFAS Grade80Excellent
Overall Grade58Good
🫧

Microplastics

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Additive migration from plastic lids

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Glass breakage and physical injury

Moderate concern

45

Bacterial growth in degraded or poorly sealed lids

Limited concern

70

Lower PFAS concern; glass containers are inherently low-risk; check lid material if possible.

Risky category by default

Pyrex 6-Piece Food Storage Container Set

Pyrex

6-Piece Food Storage Container Set

borosilicate glass with plastic lids

PFAS Grade80Excellent
Overall Grade58Good

Plastic lid degradation and replacement necessity

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic shedding from lids under heat stress

Limited concern

70
🏷️

Undisclosed chemicals in lid coatings or gasket materials

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Borosilicate glass breakage and cut hazard

Moderate concern

45

Lower PFAS concern; borosilicate glass containers pose minimal risk; plastic lids warrant standard caution.

Risky category by default

More food storage containers grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.