PFAS25/ 100Poor
Overall0/ 100Bad
SureCare Bladder Control Pad

Surecare · Incontinence Pads & Protection

SureCare Bladder Control Pad

Poor

Skip because bladder pads use water-resistant coatings often treated with PFAS; brand silent on composition.

Verdict · SkipPFAS-treated waterproof backing + silent brand disclosure on composition and safety testing make this unsuitable for prolonged skin contact.

SureCare Bladder Control Pads require a waterproof backing to function, a feature historically linked to PFAS treatments in incontinence products. Brand provides no public PFAS status, material sourcing, or independent testing disclosure.

The better-graded swap

NorthShore DoubleStop Male Guards

Northshore

NorthShore DoubleStop Male Guards

70/100 safety

70Good

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Good.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

absorbent core with waterproof backing layer (unspecified polymer)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What SureCare Bladder Control Pad is made of, ingredients and materials

SureCare pads contain an absorbent core (likely wood pulp, superabsorbent polymer, or cellulose blend) bonded to an unspecified waterproof polymer backing layer. Water-resistant coatings on incontinence products are frequently treated with PFAS (PFAS "forever chemicals") to achieve liquid barrier performance. The specific polymer identity and any chemical finishes are not disclosed by the brand, preventing transparent hazard assessment.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

75/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Waterproof polymer coatings on incontinence pads are commonly fluorinated for water repellency. SureCare does not disclose whether its backing contains PFAS, and industry-wide practice suggests it likely does.

Source, ATSDR ↗
20/ 100
🍳

Skin irritation from coatings or dyes

Unspecified polymer backing and undisclosed chemical finishes may contain irritants or allergens. Incontinence pad users often have compromised or sensitive skin, elevating risk from unknown additives.

70/ 100
🫧

Microplastic or polymer particulate release

Repeated flexing, friction, and moisture exposure can cause polymer backing degradation over time, potentially releasing microscopic particles in contact with skin.

70/ 100
⚠️

Bacterial or fungal growth if moisture retention is high

If the absorbent core or waterproof layer traps moisture rather than wicking it away, prolonged dampness may promote microbial growth, especially in warm or humid skin conditions.

70/ 100
⛏️

Chemical leaching under body heat

Prolonged contact between warm, moist skin and an unspecified synthetic backing may enhance leaching of adhesives, finishing agents, or polymer components not disclosed by the manufacturer.

70/ 100

The full breakdown

The brand's record and disclosure

SureCare does not publicly disclose material composition, PFAS use, or third-party safety certifications on available product documentation. No recalls, safety incidents, or independent testing results specific to this product line are on public record. The brand's silence on these details is particularly concerning for a product designed for prolonged contact with sensitive skin.

How it compares in its category

Most incontinence pads use similar waterproof polymer backings, and PFAS contamination is a widespread category issue. Competitor brands (e.g.Depend, Tena, Northshore) have similarly opaque disclosure, though some have begun responding to consumer pressure for materials with lower PFAS concern. SureCare's lack of any stated commitment to PFAS-free or safety-tested alternatives places it in the lower tier of transparency within the category.

If you buy it

Change pads frequently to minimize skin exposure time; do not apply heat (machine drying) as this may promote chemical migration from the backing layer. Watch for skin irritation, rash, or unusual odor as signs of potential chemical sensitivity. If used long-term, request material safety data sheets from the manufacturer and consider switching to brands with disclosed PFAS-free backing formulations.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Surecare has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Incontinence Pads & Protection

Eco by Naty Incontinence Pads

Eco By Naty

Incontinence Pads

70GoodPFAS grade
  • Bamboo-derived viscose, cotton, plant-based absorbent core
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Heavy metals
Because Booster Pads

Because Market

Because Booster Pads

70GoodPFAS grade
  • Cellulose, superabsorbent polymer, cotton blend
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Absorbent material degradation and bacterial growth

2 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

5pcs Bamboo Charcoal Washable Incontinence Pads

5pcs Bamboo Charcoal Washable Incontinence Pads

70GoodPFAS grade
  • bamboo charcoal textile, washable cotton-blend absorbent layer
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Azo dyes and synthetic colorants

4 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

More incontinence pads & protection grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.