Tranquility · Incontinence Pads & Protection
Tranquility TopLiner Booster Pads
Silent on PFAS; waterproof layer raises concern, verify before buying.
Tranquility TopLiner Booster Pads lack any public PFAS disclosure or certification. Period-care products often use waterproof backings that may contain PFAS, but the brand provides no transparency.
The better-graded swap
Bamboo Nature
Bambo Nature Changing Mats
70/100 safety
Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Good.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
Absorbent core, plastic backing (likely PE/PP), waterproof layer composition undisclosed
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
What Tranquility TopLiner Booster Pads is made of, ingredients and materials
Tranquility TopLiner Booster Pads use an absorbent core (typically superabsorbent polymer and cellulose), a plastic backing layer (likely polyethylene or polypropylene), and an undisclosed waterproof layer. The waterproof layer is the critical unknown, it may contain Teflon-type coating (Teflon) coatings or fluorinated compounds to repel moisture, which would introduce PFAS exposure during use and disposal. Without published material specifications, you cannot confirm what chemistry creates the waterproof barrier.
What’s concerning
Category baseline
The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.
Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment
Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.
PFAS
The waterproof barrier is chemically undisclosed. Industry standard practice often uses fluorinated polymers or Teflon-type coating-based coatings in incontinence products; no independent testing of Tranquility TopLiner boosters for PFAS is on public record, but the waterproof function creates a strong likelihood if the brand has not ruled it out.
Source, ATSDR ↗Skin irritation from plastic backing and adhesives
Polyethylene and polypropylene backings are chemically inert, but adhesives, fragrances, or accelerants in the adhesive layer may trigger contact dermatitis in sensitive skin. Tranquility does not disclose adhesive chemistry or the presence of fragrance additives in this product.
Microplastic shedding from degraded backing
Plastic backings can fragment during extended use, disposal, or landfill breakdown, contributing microplastic pollution. This is a systemic issue across all disposable incontinence pads, including Tranquility, with no mitigation disclosed.
Incineration hazard from fluorinated coating
If pads contain Teflon-type coating or PFAS-based waterproofing, burning them in home fires or waste incinerators can release perfluorinated gases and hydrofluoric acid, posing serious respiratory and environmental harm. Landfill disposal is recommended over burning to avoid potential releases from thermal degradation.
What’s reassuring
Superabsorbent polymer (SAP) safety
Absorbent cores rely on sodium polyacrylate or similar SAP materials, which are stable during normal use. No toxicity is reported in the medical literature for external pad use; however, ingestion or inhalation of loose particles should be avoided, particularly by children or caregivers.
The full breakdown
The brand's record and disclosure
Tranquility (owned by Essity/SCA) does not publicly disclose detailed chemical compositions, waterproof layer ingredients, or PFAS testing for this product line. No certifications like GOTS, Oeko-Tex, or EU Ecolabel are marketed for these pads. The brand has not issued statements addressing fluorochemical content in incontinence products, which is standard silence in this category, transparency is the exception, not the norm.
How it compares in its category
Most incontinence pad brands (Depend, Always Discreet, Tena, Aeroflow) share the same opacity around waterproof layer chemistry; none voluntarily disclose PFAS testing. Boosters specifically are less scrutinized than primary pads, so comparative safety data is sparse. Some competitors market plant-based or biodegradable options, but claims rarely extend to PFAS-free waterproofing. This product sits in the typical commercial mainstream, offering no distinction in chemical transparency.
If you buy it
Use pads as directed and replace them regularly to minimize skin contact duration. Do not incinerate or burn these pads, as fluorinated coatings can release toxic fumes. Store in a cool, dry place away from heat sources. If you have concerns about PFAS or chemical exposure, contact Tranquility directly requesting waterproof layer composition; lack of response reinforces the transparency gap and may warrant switching brands.
What we don’t know
- Basis
- Model estimate, 42% confidence, not a lab result
- Lab test
- None on record for this exact product
- Brand statement
- Tranquility has made none
Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.
Better-graded alternatives in Incontinence Pads & Protection
Eco By Naty
Incontinence Pads
- Bamboo-derived viscose, cotton, plant-based absorbent core
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Heavy metals
Because Market
Because Booster Pads
- Cellulose, superabsorbent polymer, cotton blend
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Absorbent material degradation and bacterial growth
2 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.
5pcs Bamboo Charcoal Washable Incontinence Pads
- bamboo charcoal textile, washable cotton-blend absorbent layer
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Azo dyes and synthetic colorants
4 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.
More incontinence pads & protection grades
How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.