PFAS25/ 100Poor
Overall21/ 100Bad
Tranquility TopLiner Super Booster Pad

Tranquility · Incontinence Pads & Protection

Tranquility TopLiner Super Booster Pad

Poor

Skip until brand discloses waterproof layer chemistry or third-party verification.

Verdict · SkipPFAS concerns in waterproof layer demand brand disclosure; no other major hazards documented, but absorption safety depends on core composition transparency.

Tranquility TopLiner Super Booster Pad uses a waterproof backing, a common application for PFAS-based water repellents in period care. Brand makes no public PFAS-avoidance disclosure or material composition statement.

The better-graded swap

LILLE Suprem Form Maxi 2920ml

Lille

LILLE Suprem Form Maxi 2920ml

70/100 safety

70Good

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Good.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Absorbent core with waterproof backing layer (composition unspecified)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What Tranquility TopLiner Super Booster Pad is made of, ingredients and materials

Tranquility TopLiner Super Booster Pad uses an unspecified absorbent core paired with a waterproof backing layer. The backing is the critical unknown, modern incontinence pads typically use either polyethylene film (lower concern) or synthetic materials treated with fluorochemicals to repel liquid, which introduces PFAS exposure risk. Without disclosure of the backing chemistry, you cannot assess whether you are absorbing waterproofing agents through skin contact during extended wear.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

75/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Waterproof backing composition is undisclosed. PFAS are common in incontinence pad barriers to repel moisture; Tranquility has not confirmed their absence or performed public testing, making this a material concern for prolonged skin exposure.

Source, ATSDR ↗
70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Skin irritation from unspecified absorbent core materials

No recalls or widespread complaints specific to Tranquility TopLiner Super Booster are on record. However, absorbent gels and pulp blends vary by manufacturer; unknown core ingredients prevent full risk assessment.

95/ 100
✅

Adhesive residue or acrylate sensitivity

Adhesive used to attach pads to underwear is not specified. Standard hot-melt acrylates are generally low-risk, but individuals with adhesive sensitivity may experience contact dermatitis; no specific issues are documented for this brand.

95/ 100
✅

Odor control additives (unknown type)

Super Booster variants sometimes include antimicrobial or odor-masking agents; Tranquility does not disclose these. If present, they could include triclosan-type chemicals or fragrance allergens, though no incidents are recorded.

95/ 100
✅

Microplastic or fiber shedding from degraded backing

No reports of pad disintegration or fiber release from this product exist in public databases. Risk is low if product is stored and used as directed, but extended moisture exposure or heat can degrade synthetic backings over time.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

The brand's record and disclosure

Tranquility (SCA brand) has not publicly disclosed the chemical composition of the waterproof layer or confirmed absence of PFAS in this product. No third-party certifications (such as OEKO-TEX, GOTS, or SaferProducts certification) are documented for this pad. The brand has issued no public commitments to phase out PFAS in incontinence products, placing it behind competitors who have begun chemical transparency initiatives.

How it compares in its category

Incontinence pads from major brands vary widely in waterproofing approach. Some manufacturers now use PFAS-free barrier films or have published test results confirming low fluorine content; Tranquility's silence on this puts it in the less transparent tier. Super Booster positioning suggests higher absorbency, which may mean thicker core and longer wear times, raising cumulative skin contact with any concerning chemicals in the backing.

If you buy it

Change pads at least every 4-6 hours to minimize skin contact duration and reduce any potential leaching from the backing layer. Store in a cool, dry place away from heat sources, as warmth can increase chemical migration. Monitor skin for irritation, rash, or unusual sensitivity; these may signal reaction to materials. Before purchase, contact SCA/Tranquility customer service directly and request a Safety Data Sheet (SDS) or written confirmation that the waterproof backing does not contain PFAS; use your answer to guide the decision.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Tranquility has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Incontinence Pads & Protection

Eco by Naty Incontinence Pads

Eco By Naty

Incontinence Pads

70GoodPFAS grade
  • Bamboo-derived viscose, cotton, plant-based absorbent core
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Heavy metals
Because Booster Pads

Because Market

Because Booster Pads

70GoodPFAS grade
  • Cellulose, superabsorbent polymer, cotton blend
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Absorbent material degradation and bacterial growth

2 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

5pcs Bamboo Charcoal Washable Incontinence Pads

5pcs Bamboo Charcoal Washable Incontinence Pads

70GoodPFAS grade
  • bamboo charcoal textile, washable cotton-blend absorbent layer
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Azo dyes and synthetic colorants

4 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

More incontinence pads & protection grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.