Wellness · Incontinence Pads & Protection
Unique Wellness Absorbent Underpads
Avoid until brand discloses waterproofing chemistry or confirms PFAS-free.
These absorbent underpads rely on waterproof barrier coatings that may contain PFAS. Wellness provides zero material disclosure or PFAS commitment.
The better-graded swap
Bamboo Nature
Bambo Nature Changing Mats
70/100 safety
Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Good.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
absorbent core with waterproof barrier layer, unspecified coating
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
What Unique Wellness Absorbent Underpads is made of, ingredients and materials
Wellness Absorbent Underpads use an absorbent core (likely cellulose or superabsorbent polymer) with an unspecified waterproof barrier layer. The barrier chemistry is critical because waterproofing in period-care products typically relies on either polyurethane coatings or PFAS-based treatments to repel fluids. Without disclosure of which method Wellness uses, you cannot assess whether you are exposed to per- and polyfluoroalkyl compounds, which accumulate in body tissue and have been linked to immune and endocrine effects. The coating degradation over time may also release particles or chemical leachates.
What’s concerning
Category baseline
The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.
Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment
Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.
PFAS
Waterproof coating chemistry is undisclosed. If polyurethane-based, PFAS risk is lower; if Teflon-family coating-based, exposure is likely. Brand refusal to disclose leaves this unresolved.
Source, ATSDR ↗Coating degradation and particle shedding
Repeated flexing, moisture cycling, and body heat can cause waterproof layer to crack or shed microparticles. No published durability data is available for this specific product.
Chemical leachates from barrier adhesives or plasticizers
Adhesives bonding the core to the barrier layer may contain phthalates or other plasticizers. Absence of ingredient disclosure prevents risk assessment.
Allergic contact dermatitis from adhesives or coatings
Individual sensitivity to undisclosed coating materials or adhesives is a known risk in period-care products, particularly if the barrier layer contains acrylics or rubber compounds.
What’s reassuring
Formaldehyde / VOCs
No recalls or reports of formaldehyde in Wellness underpads. Absorbent cellulose-based products rarely use formaldehyde, but binders can. Not documented as a problem in this product line.
Source, ATSDR ↗The full breakdown
The brand's record and disclosure
Wellness (Abena/SCA group) does not publicly disclose the waterproofing agent used in these underpads, nor do they provide PFAS-free certification. The brand has not published transparency reports on chemical composition for period-care lines as of available records. This silence is a red flag in a category where major competitors have committed to lower concern formulations and publish material safety data.
How it compares in its category
Period-care absorbent products have become a focal point for PFAS scrutiny because waterproofing is non-negotiable for performance. Brands that have voluntarily eliminated PFAS (Seventh Generation, Cora, some Kotex lines) are now industry standard-setters. Wellness underpads occupy a middle market position with less transparency than leading competitors and no documented commitment to PFAS phase-out, placing them in a higher-uncertainty tier.
If you buy it
Store in a cool, dry place away from direct heat or sunlight, as moisture and heat can degrade the waterproof coating and increase leaching risk. Replace pads after the manufacturer's recommended lifespan or if you notice coating flaking, discoloration, or odor changes. Do not heat or microwave these products. If you have sensitive skin or experience unusual irritation, discontinue use and request product composition from the brand to rule out coating-related reactions.
What we don’t know
- Basis
- Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
- Lab test
- None on record for this exact product
- Brand statement
- Wellness has made none
Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.
Better-graded alternatives in Incontinence Pads & Protection
Eco By Naty
Incontinence Pads
- Bamboo-derived viscose, cotton, plant-based absorbent core
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Heavy metals
Because Market
Because Booster Pads
- Cellulose, superabsorbent polymer, cotton blend
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Absorbent material degradation and bacterial growth
2 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.
5pcs Bamboo Charcoal Washable Incontinence Pads
- bamboo charcoal textile, washable cotton-blend absorbent layer
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Azo dyes and synthetic colorants
4 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.
More incontinence pads & protection grades
How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.