PFAS25/ 100Poor
Overall17/ 100Bad
World Centric No Tree Folded Takeout Containers

World Centric · Food Packaging

World Centric No Tree Folded Takeout Containers

Poor

Avoid until the manufacturer discloses coating chemistry or provides PFAS-free certification.

Verdict: SkipBagasse containers are safer than plastic for most uses, but PFAS-coated water barriers and lack of brand transparency warrant cautious, short-term use only.

These bagasse containers use plant-based fiber but apply a water-resistant coating to handle greasy foods, where PFAS is commonly used. The brand provides no coating disclosure, PFAS testing, or verification.

The safe swap

Karat Earth Eco-Friendly PLA Round Deli Container

Loliware

Karat Earth Eco-Friendly PLA Round Deli Container

95/100 safety

95Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Bagasse (plant fiber) with unspecified water-resistant coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent treatments have historically contained PFAS chemicals.

65/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

food packaging is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

75/ 100
🍳

Water-resistant coating chemistry (unspecified)

Bagasse naturally requires a water barrier to function as a takeout container. World Centric has not disclosed whether this coating is PFAS-based, fluorine-free wax, or another chemistry. Given industry prevalence of fluorinated coatings in bagasse products, risk cannot be ruled out.

70/ 100
🫧

Coating degradation and microparticle release

Repeated contact with hot or acidic foods can degrade any applied water barrier, potentially releasing microparticles or exposing uncoated bagasse fibers. World Centric does not specify reusability or degradation timelines, and these are single-use items.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Bagasse processing typically involves fewer bleaching steps than virgin kraft pulp, reducing formaldehyde and chlorine dioxin risk. No recalls or test failures are on record for World Centric bagasse containers in this regard.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

Microbial contamination during storage or shipping

Bagasse's porous structure can harbor bacteria if containers are stored damp. However, World Centric containers ship dry and are intended for single use only, reducing practical risk compared to reusable containers.

95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

No recalls or test data are publicly available linking World Centric bagasse containers to lead, cadmium, or other heavy metal contamination. Bagasse itself is a plant fiber with low inherent metal uptake.

Source: FDA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

World Centric's No Tree containers are molded from bagasse, the fibrous residue left after sugarcane processing. Bagasse is compostable and avoids virgin plastics, making it inherently lower-risk for BPA/BPS leaching. However, bagasse is porous and absorbs moisture, so manufacturers apply water-resistant coatings to prevent grease and liquid penetration. World Centric does not publicly disclose what coating chemistry they use on these containers, which is the critical safety gap.

The brand's record and disclosure

World Centric markets itself as an eco-conscious, sustainable brand and does hold certifications for compostability (BPI and TUV Austria). However, the company has not published ingredient lists, coating specifications, or PFAS test results for its takeout containers. This silence on coating chemistry is notable in an industry where leading competitors (notably some European bagasse producers) increasingly market PFAS-free alternatives. World Centric's lack of transparency on this issue is a red flag rather than evidence of safety.

How it compares in its category

Bagasse containers sit between plastic clamshells and coated paper. Unlike polystyrene or PET plastic, bagasse does not leach BPA or phthalates. Unlike molded fiber (kraft pulp), bagasse requires less bleaching and has lower formaldehyde risk. However, without knowing the water-resistant coating, this product cannot be confidently ranked above coated-paper alternatives that do disclose PFAS-free coatings. Peer brands (Notocup, some Vegware lines) now offer PFAS-free bagasse or paper at similar price points.

If you buy it

Use these containers for dry or ambient-temperature takeout only; avoid hot foods above 50 C (122 F) to minimize any potential coating migration. Do not microwave or heat the containers. These are intended for single use; do not reuse for food storage. Given the unknown coating, treat these as temporary food contact only and replace with a brand offering PFAS-free certification if you use takeout containers regularly. Compost after single use as intended rather than reusing.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 42% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
World Centric has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Food Packaging

World Centric Compostable Fiber Compost-A-Pak Containers

World Centric

Compostable Fiber Compost-A-Pak Containers

Fiber-based (wood pulp/molded fiber), compostable coating

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade74Good
🍳

Proprietary coating chemical migration

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Moisture and microbial growth in fiber matrix

Limited concern

70

Coating degradation under heat or fatty foods

Moderate concern

45
⚠️

Recycling contamination if misdisposed

Limited concern

70

Lower concern with documented PFAS-free commitments, though independent lab confirmation on this specific product absent.

Compostable (BPI/ASTM D6868 or equivalent)Certified compostable foodware (third-party verified)

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Vegware Compostable Microflute Takeaway Box

Vegware

Compostable Microflute Takeaway Box

Plant-based fiber (sugarcane bagasse microflute); water-based coatings

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade96Excellent

Coating degradation under heat and moisture

Limited concern

70

Lower concern; plant-based compostable packaging with stated PFAS-free positioning and limited independent verification.

OK Compost Home (EN 13432)OK Compost Industrial (EN 13432)Independently tested for PFAS-free status

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Compostable Hinged Deli Containers

Loliware

Compostable Hinged Deli Containers

Polylactic acid (PLA) bioplastic, plant-based coatings

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade92Excellent
⛏️

PLA oligomer leaching

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic generation on degradation

Limited concern

70

Lower PFAS concern; compostable bioplastic design avoids fluorine coatings.

BPI Certified CompostableMADE SAFE Certified

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

More food packaging grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.