PFAS25/ 100Poor
Overall13/ 100Bad
Maxiflo Breathable Underpad

Maxiflo · Incontinence Pads & Protection

Maxiflo Breathable Underpad

Poor

Unknown waterproof treatment; manufacturer silence raises concern.

Verdict · SkipUnknown waterproof coating and manufacturer silence on PFAS warrant caution; no other major hazards documented, but demand clarity before routine use.

Maxiflo underpads need waterproof backing to work, but Aeroflow Health keeps the coating formula secret. No third-party testing or certifications confirm safety.

The better-graded swap

Adult Bamboo Booster Pads

Adult Bamboo Booster Pads

70/100 safety

70Good

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Good.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Absorbent core with unspecified waterproof backing/coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What Maxiflo Breathable Underpad is made of, ingredients and materials

Maxiflo Breathable Underpad uses an absorbent core (likely wood pulp or superabsorbent polymer blend) paired with an unspecified waterproof backing or coating. The backing material is critical because waterproofing typically requires either polyurethane film, polyethylene, or fluorochemical treatments (PFAS-based). Since Aeroflow Health has not disclosed the backing chemistry, you cannot verify whether PFAS is present or what alternatives they've chosen.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

75/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

PFAS

The unspecified waterproof backing is the most likely vector for PFAS exposure. Fluorochemical treatments are industry standard for moisture barriers in underpads; without manufacturer confirmation, presence cannot be ruled out.

Source, ATSDR ↗
70/ 100
💨

Polyurethane or plastic off-gassing

If the backing is polyurethane film or PVC-based, volatile organic compounds (VOCs) may off-gas, especially in warm or humid storage. This is more relevant for prolonged skin contact in institutional settings.

70/ 100
⏳

Coating degradation and leachables

Over time, waterproof backings can crack or peel, potentially releasing microparticles or oligomers from the coating into skin. Underpads used repeatedly in high-moisture environments are at higher risk.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Skin irritation from unknown additives

No reported cases of contact dermatitis or sensitization specific to Maxiflo Breathable Underpad. However, unidentified coating chemicals or synthetic fibers in the absorbent core could trigger irritation in sensitive users.

95/ 100
✅

Microplastic shedding from backing

No data on whether the underpad backing sheds synthetic fibers or particles during use. Risk is low but unquantified given lack of material transparency.

95/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

Aeroflow Health is a medical supply distributor focused on incontinence and mobility aids. The company maintains minimal public transparency on product material composition or PFAS use in their manufacturing. No major recalls or safety controversies are on record for this specific product. However, the absence of proactive disclosure about waterproof coatings is unusual for a period-care brand in an era when PFAS concern is mainstream in the menstrual product industry.

How it compares in its category

Period pads and underpads in this category increasingly face scrutiny over waterproof backing treatments. Competitors like Kotex and Tampax have begun voluntary PFAS disclosure following media coverage and retailer pressure. Aeroflow's silence puts it behind the transparency curve, even though underpads are not menstrual pads and face less public-facing pressure. This product is marketed as medical/incontinence supply rather than consumer period care, which may explain lower disclosure standards.

If you buy it

Request material safety data or contact Aeroflow Health directly to confirm the waterproof backing is PFAS-free before purchase. Store in a cool, dry place away from heat sources, as some plastic and synthetic backings can degrade or release compounds when warmed. Inspect the backing regularly for cracking, peeling, or deterioration; discard if the waterproof layer fails. Wash hands after handling and avoid prolonged skin contact if you notice any chemical odor or irritation.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Maxiflo has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

What are the PFAS-free alternatives to Maxiflo Breathable Underpad?

Eco by Naty Incontinence Pads

Eco By Naty

Incontinence Pads

70GoodPFAS grade
  • Bamboo-derived viscose, cotton, plant-based absorbent core
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Heavy metals
Because Booster Pads

Because Market

Because Booster Pads

70GoodPFAS grade
  • Cellulose, superabsorbent polymer, cotton blend
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Absorbent material degradation and bacterial growth

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • bamboo charcoal textile, washable cotton-blend absorbent layer
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Azo dyes and synthetic colorants

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

More incontinence pads & protection grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.