PFAS25/ 100Poor
Overall13/ 100Bad
McKesson Ultra Heavy Absorbency Underpad

McKesson · Incontinence Pads & Protection

McKesson Ultra Heavy Absorbency Underpad

Poor

Avoid until brand discloses waterproof backing composition and treatment.

Verdict · SkipCellulose core is low-hazard; waterproof backing composition undisclosed, demand PFAS and chemical clarity from brand before repeat purchase.

McKesson's underpad has waterproof backing of unknown composition and treatment. The brand offers no PFAS claims, certifications, or ingredient transparency.

The better-graded swap

Tranquility Personal Care Pads

Tranquility

Tranquility Personal Care Pads

70/100 safety

70Good

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Good.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

cellulose, absorbent core with waterproof backing (composition unspecified)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

3M Aqua-Pure AP802B Whole House Filter Housing

Aqua Pure

3M Aqua-Pure AP802B Whole House Filter Housing

95ExcellentPFAS grade
  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

AQUASURE Premier Series 75 GPD Under Sink Reverse Osmosis Water Filtration System

Aquasure

Premier Series 75 GPD Under Sink Reverse Osmosis Water Filtration System

100ExcellentPFAS grade
  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

What McKesson Ultra Heavy Absorbency Underpad is made of, ingredients and materials

McKesson Ultra Heavy uses a cellulose absorbent core, a plant-derived material with minimal inherent toxicity, paired with an unspecified waterproof backing. The backing material and its treatment chemicals are not disclosed on packaging or brand materials reviewed. Since waterproof backings in disposable absorbent products often rely on synthetic polymers (polyethylene, polypropylene) or polyurethane films, and may incorporate water-resistant treatments, the absence of transparency on composition and additives is the primary safety concern.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

75/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
🏷️

Waterproof backing composition undisclosed

The backing material identity and water-repellency treatment (possibly PFAS-based, flame retardant, or other synthetic additives) are not specified in available product or brand documentation. This prevents assessment of leaching or off-gassing risk.

70/ 100
💨

Off-gassing from synthetic backing

If the backing is polyurethane, polyethylene, or treated polypropylene, volatile organic compounds (VOCs) or odors may occur, particularly when exposed to heat or stored in warm, humid conditions. No off-gassing testing or VOC limits are disclosed.

70/ 100
🍳

Skin contact irritation from coating additives

Waterproof backings often incorporate plasticizers, cross-linking agents, or antimicrobial coatings. Direct or prolonged skin contact with undescribed additives poses low-to-moderate risk of allergic or irritant reactions in sensitive users, especially if backing degrades over time.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Cellulose core integrity (mold/bacterial growth)

Cellulose itself does not harbor mycotoxins or pose inherent microbial risk. However, if underpads are stored in damp conditions, the cellulose can support fungal growth independent of product design.

95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

No evidence of heavy metal use in cellulose cores or standard backing materials. No recalls or safety alerts specific to this product are on public record.

Source, FDA ↗
95/ 100

The full breakdown

The brand's record and disclosure

Aeroflow Health (the distributor/brand) does not publicly disclose detailed material composition, PFAS use, or chemical certifications for this underpad product. The brand has not published environmental or safety statements regarding fluorochemical water-repellency treatments, flame retardants, or backing polymer sourcing. No independent certifications (such as OEKO-TEX or Cradle to Cradle) appear on product materials, limiting third-party verification of chemical claims.

How it compares in its category

Hospital and incontinence underpads vary widely in backing chemistry. Premium alternatives (e.g., some Medline or Attends products) publish material specifications and some carry environmental certifications. Budget options and generic brands, including McKesson lines, typically omit detailed disclosure, making direct chemical comparison difficult. Cellulose-core construction is industry standard and lower-risk than fully synthetic cores; the gap lies in backing transparency.

If you buy it

Store in a cool, dry place away from direct heat or sunlight to minimize off-gassing from backing materials. Replace underpads immediately after use (do not rinse and reuse). If used under heat sources (heating pads, warm bedding) monitor for odor or skin irritation, which may signal polymer degradation. Request detailed material safety data sheets from Aeroflow or McKesson; lack of response strengthens the case for switching to a brand with published chemical transparency.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
McKesson has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Incontinence Pads & Protection

Eco by Naty Incontinence Pads

Eco By Naty

Incontinence Pads

70GoodPFAS grade
  • Bamboo-derived viscose, cotton, plant-based absorbent core
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Heavy metals
Because Booster Pads

Because Market

Because Booster Pads

70GoodPFAS grade
  • Cellulose, superabsorbent polymer, cotton blend
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Absorbent material degradation and bacterial growth

2 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

5pcs Bamboo Charcoal Washable Incontinence Pads

5pcs Bamboo Charcoal Washable Incontinence Pads

70GoodPFAS grade
  • bamboo charcoal textile, washable cotton-blend absorbent layer
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Azo dyes and synthetic colorants

4 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

More incontinence pads & protection grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.