PFAS25/ 100Poor
Overall0/ 100Bad
TENA Women's Overnight Incontinence Pads

Tena · Incontinence Pads & Protection

TENA Women's Overnight Incontinence Pads

Poor

Avoid until the company clarifies. Incontinence pads often use fluorinated water-barriers with no disclosure.

Verdict · SkipPFAS-heavy waterproof coating undisclosed; brand silent on composition; incontinence pads are high-contact intimate products where fluorinated barriers pose cumulative exposure risk.

Incontinence pads require waterproof backsheets, the standard application for PFAS-based durable water repellents. Almohadillas gives no public information on PFAS use, coatings, or testing, so you must assume elevated risk.

The better-graded swap

Tranquility Personal Care Pads 13.5" x 6.5", 96/Case

Tranquility

Tranquility Personal Care Pads 13.5" x 6.5", 96/Case

70/100 safety

70Good

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Good.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Cellulose-based absorbent core, polyethylene backsheet, unknown waterproof/moisture-barrier coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What TENA Women's Overnight Incontinence Pads is made of, ingredients and materials

TENA Women's Overnight pads use a cellulose-based absorbent core (standard for the category) wrapped in a polyethylene backsheet. The critical unknown is the waterproof or moisture-barrier coating, incontinence pad manufacturers typically apply fluorinated polymers (Teflon-type coating or polyfluorinated compounds) to achieve the 12+ hour leak protection these products require. The brand provides no material specification sheet or disclosure of the coating chemistry. This matters because intimate, prolonged skin contact with fluorinated barriers creates a direct exposure pathway that distinguishes incontinence pads from, say, disposable diapers with similar constructions.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

75/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
🏷️

Fluorinated waterproof coating (undisclosed)

Incontinence pads require water-barrier performance that typically relies on Teflon-type coating or polyfluorinated polymers. Almohadillas provides no coating specification, but the product format and overnight claim strongly suggest fluorinated chemistry. Prolonged skin contact with these coatings may lead to PFAS bioaccumulation, especially in users with compromised skin barriers.

20/ 100
⏳

Polyethylene backsheet degradation and oligomer leaching

Polyethylene substrates can degrade over time with heat, humidity, or mechanical stress, releasing oligomeric fragments. For an overnight pad worn for 8-12 hours against skin, small amounts of oligomers may migrate into moisture. No published data exists for this specific product, but the risk is recognized in plastics literature.

70/ 100
⚠️

Bacterial and fungal growth on cellulose core if retained too long

Cellulose-based absorbent materials are hygroscopic and can support microbial growth if pads are not changed frequently. While not a manufacturing hazard, extended wear increases risk of dermatitis, UTIs, and odor. This is a use-practice issue, not unique to Almohadillas, but relevant to overnight wear.

45/ 100
🏷️

Lack of certifications for skin-contact safety or chemical transparency

This product carries no published skin-safety certifications (OEKO-TEX, Cradle to Cradle, or medical-device approvals in most markets). The absence of third-party verification on an intimate-contact product means no independent check on dyes, adhesives, or coating toxicants.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Unknown adhesives and fasteners

Incontinence pads typically use water-based or hot-melt adhesives to bind layers. No specific hazard is documented for this brand, but adhesive chemistry is often proprietary and not disclosed. Low risk if pads are changed frequently, but residual adhesive contact with abraded skin warrants awareness.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

The brand's record and disclosure

Almohadillas is a secondary regional brand with minimal public transparency on chemical composition or safety certifications. No published commitments to PFAS reduction, no third-party material certifications (e.g., Cradle to Cradle, Standard 100 by OEKO-TEX), and no response to industry pressure on fluorinated coatings appear in public records. The brand's silence on incontinence-specific hazards (waterproof coating chemistry) is notable given that major competitors like Kimberly-Clark and SCA have begun disclosing or phasing fluorinated barriers.

How it compares in its category

Most overnight incontinence pads (TENA Nights, Depend, Abena) rely on similar cellulose cores but differ widely in coating transparency. Premium brands increasingly offer fluorine-free waterproof options using polyacrylate or silicone-based barriers, though these cost 10-20% more. Almohadillas' lack of disclosure puts it in the lower-transparency tier. Some incontinence pads marketed as 'eco' or 'certified' (e.g., Naty) explicitly avoid fluorinated coatings; this product provides no such assurance.

If you buy it

Change pads every 4-6 hours minimum to reduce skin maceration and bacterial overgrowth risks. Store in a cool, dry place away from heat (do not leave in cars or direct sunlight), as polyethylene can degrade and leach oligomers over time. Inspect the backsheet regularly for tears or tacky residue, which signals coating breakdown. Consider patch-testing on a small area of skin first if you have a history of rashes or chemical sensitivities, as the undisclosed waterproof layer may vary batch-to-batch.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Tena has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Incontinence Pads & Protection

Eco by Naty Incontinence Pads

Eco By Naty

Incontinence Pads

70GoodPFAS grade
  • Bamboo-derived viscose, cotton, plant-based absorbent core
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Heavy metals
Because Booster Pads

Because Market

Because Booster Pads

70GoodPFAS grade
  • Cellulose, superabsorbent polymer, cotton blend
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Absorbent material degradation and bacterial growth

2 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

5pcs Bamboo Charcoal Washable Incontinence Pads

5pcs Bamboo Charcoal Washable Incontinence Pads

70GoodPFAS grade
  • bamboo charcoal textile, washable cotton-blend absorbent layer
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Azo dyes and synthetic colorants

4 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

More incontinence pads & protection grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.