PFAS25/ 100Poor
Overall17/ 100Bad
Poise Ultra Thin Incontinence Pads

Poise · Incontinence Pads & Protection

Poise Ultra Thin Incontinence Pads

Poor

Wait until brand publicly discloses waterproof backing material.

Verdict · SkipCellulose core is not a material linked to PFAS; synthetic absorbent layer and unspecified waterproof backing pose moderate PFAS concern until transparency improves.

Incontinence pads require waterproof backings often treated with PFAS. BetterCare offers no material transparency or PFAS statements, making independent testing necessary for assessment.

The better-graded swap

NorthShore DoubleStop Male Guards

Northshore

NorthShore DoubleStop Male Guards

70/100 safety

70Good

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Good.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

cellulose core, synthetic absorbent layer, waterproof backing (unspecified)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What Poise Ultra Thin Incontinence Pads is made of, ingredients and materials

Poise Ultra Thin pads use a cellulose core (wood pulp), which is not a material linked to PFAS for prolonged skin contact. The synthetic absorbent layer typically contains superabsorbent polymers (SAP) like sodium polyacrylate, which are well-established as non-toxic and non-leaching under normal use. The waterproof backing material is not disclosed by BetterCare, which is the critical unknown, waterproof backings in menstrual and incontinence products commonly use Teflon-type coating or Teflon-type coating-free fluorinated polymers as water barriers, and these are the primary PFAS exposure route in this category.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

75/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Waterproof backing material is not disclosed. If Teflon-type coating or other Teflon-family coating are used (common in incontinence pads), repeated skin contact over hours poses chronic low-level PFAS exposure, particularly through dermal absorption and vaginal mucosa permeability.

Source, ATSDR ↗
70/ 100
⚠️

Dermatitis from synthetic backing or adhesives

Unspecified waterproof backing and adhesive formulations may contain allergens or irritants (e.g., acrylates, rubber accelerators); no brand-specific incident reports are available, but incontinence pad users with reactive skin have reported localized irritation that resolves after switching products.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Skin irritation from superabsorbent polymers (SAP)

Sodium polyacrylate and similar SAPs used in the absorbent layer are non-toxic and approved for this use; no recalls or widespread complaints on record for Poise Ultra Thin specifically. Individual sensitivities remain possible but are not a product-class hazard.

95/ 100
✅

Microplastic shedding from synthetic layers

No documented evidence of microplastic release from intact cellulose-synthetic hybrid pads under normal use conditions. Degradation becomes possible only after prolonged exposure to heat, moisture, or physical damage.

95/ 100
✅

Packaging off-gassing or ink transfer

No specific safety alerts on BetterCare packaging materials; standard practice uses minimal inks and non-toxic plastic film. Risk is negligible for unopened, properly stored products.

95/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

BetterCare has not publicly disclosed the chemical composition of the waterproof backing or stated any PFAS-free certification for this product line. No independent recalls or safety alerts are on record for Poise Ultra Thin pads. The brand provides no published transparency report on material sourcing, chemical testing, or compliance with emerging PFAS restrictions, which is typical of mid-tier incontinence brands but leaves consumers without assurance on this specific hazard.

How it compares in its category

Premium competitors (Always, Kotex) and PFAS-conscious brands (Seventh Generation, Natracare) either disclose backing materials or market PFAS-free formulations; BetterCare sits in the middle, no transparency and no explicit safety claim. Ultra-thin design means less total material, which slightly reduces overall PFAS burden if the backing is fluorinated, but this is not a substitute for disclosure. Most conventional pads in this price range carry similar unspecified backing risks.

If you buy it

Store pads in a cool, dry place away from direct heat or sunlight, as heat can stress waterproof coatings. Change pads regularly (per product instructions) to minimize prolonged skin contact and any potential leachate. Do not heat, wash, or reuse pads. If you have sensitive skin or unexplained irritation, discontinue and test an alternative with disclosed PFAS-free backing. Consider writing to BetterCare requesting waterproof material disclosure; consumer demand is the fastest path to transparency in this category.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Poise has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

What are the PFAS-free alternatives to Poise Ultra Thin Incontinence Pads?

Eco by Naty Incontinence Pads

Eco By Naty

Incontinence Pads

70GoodPFAS grade
  • Bamboo-derived viscose, cotton, plant-based absorbent core
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Heavy metals
Because Booster Pads

Because Market

Because Booster Pads

70GoodPFAS grade
  • Cellulose, superabsorbent polymer, cotton blend
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Absorbent material degradation and bacterial growth

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • bamboo charcoal textile, washable cotton-blend absorbent layer
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Azo dyes and synthetic colorants

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

More incontinence pads & protection grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.