PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall8/ 100Bad
Black Diamond Men's Legend Gloves

Black Diamond · Waterproof Winter Gloves

Black Diamond Men's Legend Gloves

Bad

Avoid unless Black Diamond discloses water-repellent coating formula, outdoor gloves commonly use PFAS-based water repellents.

Verdict · SkipPFAS chemistry in water-repellent coating unconfirmed; leather/synthetic base is low-risk if maintained. Contact Black Diamond for transparency before repurchasing.

These mountaineering gloves use water-repellent coating treatment, a material class historically reliant on PFAS. Black Diamond makes no public statement on PFAS avoidance or chemistry.

The better-graded swap

Better Sweater Gloves Patagonia Women's

Patagonia

Better Sweater Gloves Patagonia Women's

90/100 safety

90Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Leather/synthetic upper with water-repellent coating-treated exterior

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What Black Diamond Men's Legend Gloves is made of, ingredients and materials

The Legend uses leather or leather-synthetic blends on the exterior with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish applied to the shell. Leather itself poses minimal chemical hazards in gloves, but the water-repellent coating is the critical unknown, outdoor brands commonly apply PFAS-based fluorochemical treatments (perfluorinated compounds) to achieve water beading, though some now use PFAS-free alternatives. The interior lining material (fleece, wool, or synthetic) is not publicly detailed but typical for winter gloves and low-risk if not chemically treated. Degradation of the water-repellent coating over time through washing or use will not create hazardous byproducts, but will reduce water resistance.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

PFAS

The water-repellent finish is likely fluorochemical-based, but alternatives without fluorochemical water repellents are increasingly available. Black Diamond has not disclosed which formulation is used in the Legend Gloves, creating uncertainty about persistent organic pollutants.

Source, ATSDR ↗
70/ 100
🎨

Azo dyes in colored textiles

Black dyes on the exterior shell may include azo compounds, which can break down under UV or sweat to release carcinogenic amines. Leather is often dyed post-tanning; testing is rare for gloves. Risk is low in practice (gloves are worn, not ingested), but sensitivity to dye bleeding is possible.

70/ 100
⏳

Coating degradation and re-treatment needs

As the water-repellent coating wears, users may resort to commercial re-treatments; if aftermarket products contain legacy PFAS or are applied incorrectly indoors, exposure risk increases. This is a usage-dependent hazard rather than a manufacturing flaw.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Leather tanning residues

Leather gloves commonly use chromium-based or vegetable tanning; no specific contamination or allergic reactions are documented for Black Diamond Legend models. Standard leather handling (avoid prolonged contact with skin if sensitive to tannins) applies.

95/ 100
✅

Synthetic lining off-gassing

Interior fleece or polyester linings may contain trace formaldehyde or other volatile organics, but winter gloves are worn over skin (not in contact with face/mouth) and are well-ventilated, minimizing inhalation risk. No reported incidents for this product.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

The brand's record and disclosure

Black Diamond (owned by Clarus Corp) has not publicly disclosed its water-repellent coating chemistry for this model or confirmed PFAS-free status across its glove line as of available records. The brand does not maintain a transparent chemical disclosure policy comparable to leading outdoor apparel makers (e.g., Patagonia, Arc'teryx). No recalls or documented safety incidents specific to the Legend Gloves are on record. A direct inquiry to Black Diamond's customer service about water-repellent coating composition is the only way to confirm whether this product uses legacy PFAS or newer alternatives.

How it compares in its category

Winter gloves at Black Diamond's price point and performance tier typically carry the same water-repellent coating disclosure gap as competitors; this is not unique to the Legend. Budget alternatives often use untreated synthetic shells or older Teflon-type coating-based coatings, while premium outdoor brands (Rab, Hestra, some Patagonia lines) increasingly advertise PFAS-free water-repellent coating or detailed chemistry. The Legend sits in the mid-premium segment where PFAS transparency is still uncommon, making it representative of the broader industry standard rather than an outlier.

If you buy it

Wash the gloves by hand in cool water with mild detergent to preserve the water-repellent coating as long as possible; machine washing or hot water will degrade it faster. Never dry-clean or expose to sustained heat above 60°C (140°F), as this can break down the coating. Once the water-repellent coating stops working after 2-4 seasons of regular use, you can retreat the gloves with aftermarket PFAS-free water-repellent coating products (e.g., Nikwax) or retire them. Before purchasing, email Black Diamond directly asking whether the water-repellent coating is PFAS-free or legacy fluorochemical; a clear answer will inform your decision.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Black Diamond has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Waterproof Winter Gloves

Better Sweater Gloves Patagonia Women's

Patagonia

Better Sweater Gloves Patagonia Women's

90ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Polyester fleece (recycled)
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

Patagonia R4 Yulex Regulator Three Finger Mitts

Patagonia

R4 Yulex Regulator Three Finger Mitts

90ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Yulex (synthetic rubber), neoprene-free alternative
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Allergic contact dermatitis (rubber/guayule sensitivity)

2 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

Patagonia Synchilla Gloves

Patagonia

Synchilla Gloves

90ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Polyester fleece (Synchilla®); no water-repellent treatment disclosed
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Microplastics

2 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

More waterproof winter gloves grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.