PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
Gordini Men's GTX Storm Short Winter Gloves

Gordini · Waterproof Winter Gloves

Gordini Men's GTX Storm Short Winter Gloves

Bad

High PFAS risk; GTX membrane likely contains PFCs, brand undisclosed.

Verdict · SkipGTX membrane carries high PFAS risk with limited brand transparency; other synthetic hazards are standard for the category but manageable with proper care.

GTX Storm gloves use Gore-Tex, a Teflon-family coating membrane with historical PFAS chemistry. Gordini makes no public statement on PFAS content or alternatives.

The better-graded swap

Patagonia R4 Yulex Regulator Three Finger Mitts

Patagonia

Patagonia R4 Yulex Regulator Three Finger Mitts

90/100 safety

90Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Nylon/polyester with GTX (Gore-Tex) waterproof-breathable membrane

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What Gordini Men's GTX Storm Short Winter is made of, ingredients and materials

Gordini Storm gloves combine nylon and polyester shell fabrics with a Gore-Tex (GTX) waterproof-breathable membrane. Gore-Tex is a microporous Teflon-type coating film that repels water while allowing vapor transmission, but Teflon-type coating-based membranes are typically finished with fluorocarbon compounds (PFCs) to achieve durable water repellency. The nylon-polyester blend itself is chemically stable under normal wear, but the membrane treatment is where chemical hazard concentrates. Gordini has not publicly disclosed whether their GTX products use legacy or newer fluorocarbon chemistry.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

Fluorocarbon compounds (PFCs) in GTX membrane

Gore-Tex membranes are conventionally finished with Teflon-type coating and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)-based water repellents or newer short-chain alternatives. Gordini has not disclosed which chemistry their gloves use, so legacy high-persistence compounds cannot be ruled out.

20/ 100
🍂

Membrane delamination and microplastic shedding

After 2-3 years of heavy use or improper care (heat, washing), the Teflon-type coating membrane can crack or peel, potentially releasing synthetic polymer particles that could be inhaled during removal or ingestion if particles contact food-handling surfaces.

70/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Polyester and nylon fabrics are often treated with formaldehyde-based resins for dimensional stability and wrinkle resistance. Initial off-gassing from new gloves is typically minimal but may occur during first washes in warm water.

Source, ATSDR ↗
70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Azo dyes in nylon-polyester blend

Gordini does not publish colorant sourcing. Nylon and polyester can be dyed with azo dyes; modern apparel typically avoids azo compounds that cleave to release carcinogenic amines, but absence of public commitment means residual trace risk exists.

95/ 100
✅

Antimony residues in polyester

Polyester is occasionally produced using antimony trioxide as a catalyst. No recalls or independent testing of Gordini gloves for antimony have been published, and typical migration into skin contact is negligible, but brand does not disclose supplier controls.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

The brand's record and disclosure

Gordini is owned by the same parent company as other winter apparel brands but maintains minimal public stance on PFAS or chemical use in waterproof products. The brand does not advertise membership in organizations like Bluesign or Zero Discharge of Hazardous Chemicals (ZDHC), which would indicate third-party chemical management oversight. No voluntary recalls or published safety controversies are documented for this specific model. Gordini's silence on PFAS in GTX products reflects a broader industry pattern where membrane manufacturers (not apparel brands) control formulation details.

How it compares in its category

Most winter glove brands use GTX or similar Teflon-type coating-based membranes, so this product is not unusual in its PFAS exposure profile. Some premium competitors (e.g., Patagonia, Arc'teryx) now provide transparency on fluorocarbon chemistry or offer PFAS-free alternatives like waxed wool or silicone-based waterproofing, though these trade durability for reduced chemical footprint. Budget-friendly brands like Gordini rarely publicize chemical composition. This product's risk tier is typical for conventional GTX gloves, not an outlier, but that does not reduce absolute hazard.

If you buy it

Wash gloves by hand in cool water with mild detergent after heavy use to reduce salt accumulation and membrane degradation; avoid machine washing and high heat, which can delaminate GTX. Do not dry-clean or bleach. Store in a dry place away from direct sunlight to prevent UV damage to nylon, which can increase fiber brittleness over 2-3 seasons of heavy use. Replace gloves if the membrane shows visible cracking, peeling, or loss of water beading, as degraded membranes may leach synthetic polymer particles into sweat. PFAS from the membrane will not transfer meaningfully during normal wear, but washing may release trace amounts into wastewater.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 58% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Gordini has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Waterproof Winter Gloves

Better Sweater Gloves Patagonia Women's

Patagonia

Better Sweater Gloves Patagonia Women's

90ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Polyester fleece (recycled)
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

Patagonia R4 Yulex Regulator Three Finger Mitts

Patagonia

R4 Yulex Regulator Three Finger Mitts

90ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Yulex (synthetic rubber), neoprene-free alternative
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Allergic contact dermatitis (rubber/guayule sensitivity)

2 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

Patagonia Synchilla Gloves

Patagonia

Synchilla Gloves

90ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Polyester fleece (Synchilla®); no water-repellent treatment disclosed
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Microplastics

2 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

More waterproof winter gloves grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.