PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall16/ 100Bad
Hestra Heater Gauntlet

Hestra · Waterproof Winter Gloves

Hestra Heater Gauntlet

Bad

Gauntlet uses water-repellent coating treatment typical of the category, Hestra won't disclose PFAS status, contact brand before buying.

Verdict · SkipPolyamide winter gloves with undisclosed water-repellent coating treatment; no established non-PFAS hazards recorded, but PFAS opacity and lack of brand transparency warrant pre-purchase contact.

This polyamide gauntlet features a water-repellent coating finish with insulated lining, a feature common in outdoor apparel historically reliant on PFAS chemistry. Hestra has made no public statement about PFAS in this product or a broader commitment to PFAS-free materials.

The better-graded swap

Better Sweater Gloves Patagonia Women's

Patagonia

Better Sweater Gloves Patagonia Women's

90/100 safety

90Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Polyamide shell with water-repellent coating-treated exterior; insulated lining

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What Hestra Heater Gauntlet is made of, ingredients and materials

The Hestra Heater Gauntlet uses a polyamide (nylon) shell with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) exterior coating and insulated lining. Polyamide itself is chemically stable and unlikely to leach during normal wear. The water-repellent coating treatment is the primary concern, conventional water-repellent coating finishes in the glove category typically rely on fluorocarbon compounds (PFAS), though some brands have shifted to fluorine-free alternatives. Hestra has not publicly disclosed which type is used on this model.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
🏷️

PFAS

Water-repellent coating treatment on polyamide gloves commonly uses PFAS compounds; Hestra does not disclose which type is applied. This is the primary chemical concern for this product.

Source, ATSDR ↗
70/ 100

What’s reassuring

💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No formaldehyde contamination or formaldehyde resin use is documented for Hestra gloves. Polyamide shell and typical synthetic insulation do not inherently contain formaldehyde, though some dyes in the lining could theoretically carry trace residues; no public testing or complaints exist for this product line.

Source, ATSDR ↗
95/ 100
✅

Azo dyes in textiles

Azo dyes are hazardous only when they release aromatic amines; Hestra, as an EU-based brand, is subject to REACH regulations that restrict certain azo dyes. No recalls or test failures have been reported. Standard washing should not release dyes from finished gloves.

95/ 100
🫧

Microplastics

Polyamide fiber shedding is possible during wear and washing, particularly with agitation. No specific testing of Hestra Gauntlets for microplastic release is on record. Risk is typical for synthetic fiber gloves and not unique to this product.

Source, EPA ↗
95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

No lead, cadmium, or other heavy metal contamination has been reported in Hestra gloves. Polyamide and synthetic insulation do not typically contain heavy metals unless added as colorants. No public testing contradicts this assessment.

Source, FDA ↗
95/ 100

The full breakdown

The brand's record and disclosure

Hestra is a Swedish glove manufacturer with a long history but minimal public transparency on hazardous substances. The brand does not maintain a published restricted substances list, PFAS disclosure statement, or chemical certifications visible on product pages or websites reviewed. No recalls or confirmed chemical contamination incidents are on record for Hestra gloves. Contact with the brand directly is the only way to verify water-repellent coating chemistry before purchase.

How it compares in its category

Most premium winter gloves in this price range use polyamide shells with water-repellent coating coatings; few brands disclose treatment type publicly. Competitors like Arc'teryx, Mammut, and some Outdoor Research models have begun moving toward fluorine-free water-repellent coating or provide transparency statements. Hestra's silence on this issue puts it in the middle of the pack for disclosure standards, neither leading nor notably lagging, but offering less certainty than brands with published chemical policies.

If you buy it

Before purchase, email Hestra customer service asking specifically whether the Heater Gauntlet uses PFAS-based or fluorine-free water-repellent coating treatment. Care instructions should be followed closely, hand wash or gentle machine wash in cool water, air dry flat, and avoid heat drying. Do not expose gloves to temperatures above 60°C (140°F), as polyamide can degrade and coatings may fail. Replace if the water-repellent coating visibly degrades (water no longer beads on the surface) or seams separate, as this increases moisture entry and defeats the product's function.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 42% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Hestra has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Waterproof Winter Gloves

Better Sweater Gloves Patagonia Women's

Patagonia

Better Sweater Gloves Patagonia Women's

90ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Polyester fleece (recycled)
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

Patagonia R4 Yulex Regulator Three Finger Mitts

Patagonia

R4 Yulex Regulator Three Finger Mitts

90ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Yulex (synthetic rubber), neoprene-free alternative
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Allergic contact dermatitis (rubber/guayule sensitivity)

2 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

Patagonia Synchilla Gloves

Patagonia

Synchilla Gloves

90ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Polyester fleece (Synchilla®); no water-repellent treatment disclosed
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Microplastics

2 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

More waterproof winter gloves grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.