PFAS25/ 100Poor
Overall13/ 100Bad
Rearz - Overnight Booster Pads - Lightly Scented 1 Booster Pad

Rearz · Incontinence Pads & Protection

Rearz - Overnight Booster Pads - Lightly Scented 1 Booster Pad

Poor

Avoid pending disclosure of waterproof treatment from Rearz.

Verdict · SkipPFAS waterproof coating undisclosed and unverified; absorbent core materials not detailed; no major recalls or toxicant reports on record, but transparency gaps warrant cautious use.

Overnight booster pads need waterproof backing typically treated with fluorochemicals. Rearz shares no PFAS or material information.

The better-graded swap

Protection Plus Classic Underwear Medium Fits 28" to 40" waist -Bag of 20

Protection Plus

Protection Plus Classic Underwear Medium Fits 28" to 40" waist -Bag of 20

70/100 safety

70Good

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Good.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Absorbent core, waterproof backing (unspecified polymer coating)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What Rearz - Overnight Booster Pads - Lightly is made of, ingredients and materials

Rearz Overnight Booster Pads use an absorbent core (likely cellulose, superabsorbent polymer, or blend) with an unspecified waterproof polymer backing. The scent is noted but fragrance ingredients are not itemized on packaging or public disclosures. The waterproof layer is the critical unknown, if it contains Teflon-type coating, polyurethane, or PFAS-treated materials, direct skin contact during extended wear poses potential exposure risks. Without material transparency from Rearz, this product falls into a middle-risk category for period care.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

75/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Waterproof polymer backing type is not disclosed. PFAS chemicals are common in waterproof period-care products but Rearz has not confirmed or denied their use. Direct skin contact during extended overnight wear increases exposure risk if PFAS are present.

Source, ATSDR ↗
70/ 100
⚠️

Fragrance allergens and skin irritation

Product is labeled 'Lightly Scented' but specific fragrance ingredients are not listed. Synthetic fragrances and fragrance allergens (e.g., limonene, linalool) can trigger contact dermatitis or sensitization during prolonged skin contact in a warm, moist environment.

70/ 100
⏳

Polymer coating degradation from moisture and heat

Unspecified waterproof backing may degrade over time with exposure to body heat, sweat, and repeated flexing. Degradation could release unreported polymer fragments or adhesive components into contact with skin.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Superabsorbent polymer (SAP) dust and ingestion risk

No recalls or incidents reported for Rearz pads. SAP is not a material linked to PFAS in period care products, but degraded or damaged pads may shed microparticles. Risk remains theoretical and is typical across the category.

95/ 100
✅

Undisclosed adhesives and glues

No public information on adhesive chemistry in this booster pad. Most period pads use acrylic or hot-melt adhesives, which are generally low-hazard, but Rearz does not disclose this detail.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

The brand's record and disclosure

Rearz maintains a silent stance on PFAS use and provides minimal chemical disclosure beyond absorbency claims. No published third-party certifications (e.g., GreenGuard, Cradle to Cradle, or OEKO-TEX equivalents) are publicly associated with this product line. No major recalls or safety violations have been documented for this specific booster pad. The lack of proactive material transparency is a significant red flag in a category where prolonged skin contact justifies full ingredient disclosure.

How it compares in its category

Period care boosters and pads vary widely in waterproof coating chemistry. Brands like Seventh Generation and some Kotex lines disclose polymer types; Rearz does not. Most mass-market boosters use plastic backings without PFAS verification, making Rearz typical in this regard but not best-in-class. Brands with explicit PFAS-free or organic certifications command premium pricing and offer clearer safety assurances.

If you buy it

Replace pads daily or after 8 hours of use to minimize skin exposure to moisture and potential leachates. Do not expose to heat sources (dryers, direct sunlight for storage) as this may degrade the waterproof backing. If skin irritation, rash, or unusual odor develops, discontinue and switch to a certified alternative. Contact Rearz directly to request full material safety data sheets and PFAS testing results before repurchasing.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Rearz has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Incontinence Pads & Protection

Eco by Naty Incontinence Pads

Eco By Naty

Incontinence Pads

70GoodPFAS grade
  • Bamboo-derived viscose, cotton, plant-based absorbent core
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Heavy metals
Because Booster Pads

Because Market

Because Booster Pads

70GoodPFAS grade
  • Cellulose, superabsorbent polymer, cotton blend
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Absorbent material degradation and bacterial growth

2 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

5pcs Bamboo Charcoal Washable Incontinence Pads

5pcs Bamboo Charcoal Washable Incontinence Pads

70GoodPFAS grade
  • bamboo charcoal textile, washable cotton-blend absorbent layer
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Azo dyes and synthetic colorants

4 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

More incontinence pads & protection grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.