PFAS25/ 100Poor
Overall21/ 100Bad
Rearz - Overnight Booster Pads Sample Pack

Rearz · Incontinence Pads & Protection

Rearz - Overnight Booster Pads Sample Pack

Poor

Unknown waterproof backing material, no PFAS data available.

Verdict · SkipUnknown PFAS in waterproof backing is a material concern; other hazard data absent. Request material disclosure from brand before regular use.

Rearz booster pads have waterproof backing but the company reveals nothing about what polymer is used or whether PFAS testing occurred. No third-party certifications or lab results exist.

The better-graded swap

TENA Very Light

Tena

TENA Very Light

70/100 safety

70Good

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Good.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Absorbent core, waterproof backing layer (unspecified polymer)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What Rearz - Overnight Booster Pads Sample Pack is made of, ingredients and materials

Rearz overnight boosters use an unspecified absorbent core (likely superabsorbent polymer or cellulose blend) paired with a waterproof backing layer of unknown polymer composition. The backing is critical because it sits against skin for extended periods; if it contains PFAS-based water repellents or unknown synthetic polymers, leaching risk increases with moisture and body heat. The brand has not published material safety data sheets or ingredient transparency for this product, making independent hazard assessment incomplete.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

75/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Waterproof polymer layer composition is undisclosed. PFAS-based water repellents are common in period-care products; extended skin contact with unknown polymers during overnight use elevates exposure risk.

Source, ATSDR ↗
70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Skin sensitizers in absorbent core or adhesives

No published testing or incidents on record for this product. Superabsorbent polymers and adhesives in period pads may contain residual monomers or cross-linkers; absence of data does not confirm safety.

95/ 100
✅

Degradation or shedding of polymer layers

No reported failures documented. Extended moisture exposure during overnight use may degrade polymer coatings over time; risk level unknown without material specifications.

95/ 100
✅

Fragrance or scent additives

Product packaging does not list fragrance content. If present, fragrance compounds can trigger allergic contact dermatitis, particularly on sensitive genital skin during extended contact.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

The brand's record and disclosure

Reartz maintains no published stance on PFAS use, chemical testing, or material certifications for period-care products. The company does not list third-party safety certifications (FSC, Oeko-Tex, or similar) on product packaging or website. No major product recalls or safety controversies are on record for this line, but the silence on material composition is itself a transparency red flag in a category where skin contact hazards are high.

How it compares in its category

Competitors like Seventh Generation, Thinx, and Knix publish detailed chemical disclosures and many carry independent certifications for non-toxic materials. Rearts overnight boosters occupy a mid-market price point without matching disclosure standards of safety-focused brands. This product sits in a gap where cost is competitive but material assurance is below industry best practice for intimate care.

If you buy it

Store in a cool, dry place away from direct heat or sunlight, as moisture exposure may increase leaching from the waterproof backing. Replace pads every 4-6 hours or sooner if saturation occurs, to minimize prolonged skin contact with the polymer layer. Discontinue use immediately if skin irritation, rash, or odor develops. Contact the brand directly to request a material safety data sheet and PFAS testing results before making repeat purchases.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Rearz has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Incontinence Pads & Protection

Eco by Naty Incontinence Pads

Eco By Naty

Incontinence Pads

70GoodPFAS grade
  • Bamboo-derived viscose, cotton, plant-based absorbent core
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Heavy metals
Because Booster Pads

Because Market

Because Booster Pads

70GoodPFAS grade
  • Cellulose, superabsorbent polymer, cotton blend
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Absorbent material degradation and bacterial growth

2 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

5pcs Bamboo Charcoal Washable Incontinence Pads

5pcs Bamboo Charcoal Washable Incontinence Pads

70GoodPFAS grade
  • bamboo charcoal textile, washable cotton-blend absorbent layer
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Azo dyes and synthetic colorants

4 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

More incontinence pads & protection grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.