PFAS40/ 100Poor
Overall18/ 100Bad
Rubbermaid Brilliance StainShield Plastic Food Storage Containers

Rubbermaid · Food Storage Containers

Rubbermaid Brilliance StainShield Plastic Food Storage Containers

Poor

Lower concern for rigid food-storage plastic, but stain-resistance treatment warrants caution without disclosure.

Verdict: SkipPolypropylene base is safe; stain-resistant coating lacks transparency on chemistry and PFAS risk. Use with caution and avoid high-heat storage.

Rubbermaid Brilliance containers are primarily polypropylene, a common food-safe plastic with lower inherent PFAS risk than coated cookware. However, the StainShield branding suggests a treatment applied for stain resistance, which Rubbermaid doesn't publicly disclose.

The safe swap

Pyrex 6-Piece Food Storage Container Set

Pyrex

Pyrex 6-Piece Food Storage Container Set

80/100 safety

80Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Polypropylene (PP) plastic with stain-resistant treatment

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Stain-resistant finish

Stain resistance treatments commonly use PFAS chemicals.

80/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

PFAS exposure happens more often with clothing products.

75/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

PFAS

The StainShield coating's chemical composition is undisclosed. Stain-resistant coatings in food-contact plastics often use fluorinated compounds (PFAS) to repel oils and water; without transparency, the presence of PFAS cannot be ruled out and is a significant concern for high-contact food items.

Source: ATSDR
70/ 100

Coating degradation and migration

Over time, any proprietary coating on plastic can degrade, flake, or migrate into food, especially if scratched or exposed to acidic or hot foods. User reports of coating cloudiness and peeling on older Brilliance containers suggest this is a real degradation pattern.

45/ 100
🫧

Microplastic shedding from wear

Repeated scratching, washing, or thermal stress on the plastic surface or stain-resistant coating can gradually release microplastic particles, particularly if the coating flakes or degrades.

70/ 100
🍳

Heat-induced leaching from coating

If stored or reheated at temperatures above 80°C, the stain-resistant coating may begin to leach components into food. Polypropylene itself is stable; the risk is from the added treatment.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

🍼

BPA & bisphenols

Polypropylene does not inherently contain BPA or phthalates. No recalls or evidence of contamination in this product class from the base material.

Source: FDA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Rubbermaid Brilliance containers are made from polypropylene (PP, #5 plastic), a thermoplastic polymer with a relatively high heat tolerance compared to PET or PVC. The StainShield treatment is a proprietary stain-resistant coating applied to the plastic surface; Rubbermaid has not publicly disclosed its chemical composition, raising questions about whether it contains PFAS or other fluorinated compounds commonly used in food-contact stain blockers. Polypropylene itself is not known to leach BPA or phthalates under normal use, but the integrity and composition of the added coating are the primary concern.

The brand's record and disclosure

Rubbermaid (owned by Newell Brands) has not published a PFAS policy specific to food storage containers and has not disclosed the chemical identity of the StainShield coating. The company has faced no major recalls related to these containers for chemical hazards, but its silence on coating chemistry is notable given industry awareness of PFAS in food-contact coatings. Newell Brands has made general sustainability commitments but has not transparently addressed PFAS restrictions in rigid food storage.

How it compares in its category

Most rigid food storage containers (Pyrex glass, stainless steel, or untreated polypropylene alternatives like Sistema or OXO) do not use proprietary stain-resistant coatings. Rubbermaid's StainShield is a feature designed to reduce permanent staining from foods like tomato sauce; this convenience comes at the cost of chemical opacity. Containers with transparent material and no added coatings are a safer baseline; this product sits in a middle category where the benefit (stain resistance) is cosmetic rather than functional, making the chemical risk trade-off harder to justify.

If you buy it

Avoid storing hot foods or liquids in these containers; use them only for cold or room-temperature storage. Polypropylene has a heat tolerance around 100-120°C (212-250°F), but the stain-resistant coating may degrade or leach at high temperatures. Do not microwave unless the lid is labeled microwave-safe separately. Replace containers if the coating shows visible peeling, cloudiness, or degradation, as this signals potential loss of coating integrity and possible migration of coating particles into food.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Rubbermaid has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Food Storage Containers

Pyrex Glass Meal Prep Set

Pyrex

Glass Meal Prep Set

borosilicate glass with metal lids (likely stainless steel or aluminum)

PFAS Grade95Excellent
Overall Grade71Good
⛏️

Metal lid corrosion and leaching

Limited concern

70

Silicone or rubber gasket degradation

Moderate concern

45
⚠️

Thermal shock fracture from glass

Moderate concern

45

Lower PFAS concern; glass meal prep containers are inherently a safer material choice.

Risky category by default

Pyrex Freshlock 10-Piece Glass Storage Set

Pyrex

Freshlock 10-Piece Glass Storage Set

Borosilicate glass containers with plastic lids (PP/TPE closure material unspecified)

PFAS Grade80Excellent
Overall Grade58Good
🫧

Microplastics

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Additive migration from plastic lids

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Glass breakage and physical injury

Moderate concern

45

Bacterial growth in degraded or poorly sealed lids

Limited concern

70

Lower PFAS concern; glass containers are inherently low-risk; check lid material if possible.

Risky category by default

Pyrex 6-Piece Food Storage Container Set

Pyrex

6-Piece Food Storage Container Set

borosilicate glass with plastic lids

PFAS Grade80Excellent
Overall Grade58Good

Plastic lid degradation and replacement necessity

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic shedding from lids under heat stress

Limited concern

70
🏷️

Undisclosed chemicals in lid coatings or gasket materials

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Borosilicate glass breakage and cut hazard

Moderate concern

45

Lower PFAS concern; borosilicate glass containers pose minimal risk; plastic lids warrant standard caution.

Risky category by default

More food storage containers grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.