PFAS25/ 100Poor
Overall17/ 100Bad
Tena ProSkin Overnight Protection Incontinence

Tena · Incontinence Pads & Protection

Tena ProSkin Overnight Protection Incontinence

Poor

Waterproof incontinence product, unverified PFAS status. Avoid if concerned.

Verdict · SkipNonwoven incontinence product with unverified PFAS in waterproof backing; no other major hazards reported. Acceptable if PFAS concern is secondary.

This brand discloses no PFAS information for this overnight product. Waterproof backing commonly uses water repellent coatings that may contain PFAS, but manufacturer silence prevents verification of actual composition.

The better-graded swap

CVS Women's Protective Pads Moderate Absorbency

CVS Health

CVS Women's Protective Pads Moderate Absorbency

70/100 safety

70Good

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Good.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

nonwoven cellulose, superabsorbent polymer, waterproof backing

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What Tena ProSkin Overnight Protection is made of, ingredients and materials

Tena ProSkin Overnight uses nonwoven cellulose layers bonded to a superabsorbent polymer core and waterproof plastic backing. The backing layer is the likely source of any PFAS risk, as water-resistant materials in absorbent hygiene products commonly use fluorinated coatings to achieve leak prevention. The cellulose and SAP itself are standard food-grade materials with no inherent toxicity concerns.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

75/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Incontinence products commonly use PFAS-based or perfluorinated polymers in water-resistant films. Tena has not transparently ruled this out; dermal contact risk is low but bioaccumulation potential exists with long-term use. See separate PFAS assessment (25/100).

Source, ATSDR ↗
70/ 100
💨

Plastic backing off-gassing

Waterproof plastic films can emit volatile organic compounds (VOCs) if heated or stored in warm conditions. Risk is low for skin-contact use at room temperature but increases if product is exposed to heat or direct sun for extended periods.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Superabsorbent polymer (sodium polyacrylate) safety

SAP is widely used in diapers and incontinence products; no credible evidence links it to systemic toxicity via skin contact. Inhalation of dry powder is theoretically possible during opening but minimal in pre-assembled products.

95/ 100
✅

Nonwoven cellulose contaminants

Cellulose fibers in hygiene products are generally well-regulated and do not shed microplastics. No reported contamination with formaldehyde resins or chlorine bleach residues specific to Tena incontinence products.

95/ 100
✅

Skin sensitization or irritation

Tena ProSkin line is formulated with skin-care additives and is dermatologically tested. No major recalls for allergic reactions or irritant contact dermatitis have been publicly reported for this product.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

The brand's record and disclosure

Tena (SCA/Essity) does not publicly disclose PFAS content or commit to PFAS-free formulations across their incontinence range. The brand has not faced major recalls for chemical hazards in incontinence products, and their manufacturing is generally subject to EU and FDA oversight. No independent third-party certifications (e.g., Cradle to Cradle, Nordic Swan) are visible for this specific product line, limiting external verification.

How it compares in its category

Tena is a mainstream, established brand in absorbent incontinence products, competing alongside Depend, Poise, and store brands. Most competitors in this category also use waterproof plastic backings with unverified or undisclosed PFAS status, making Tena representative rather than exceptional. Smaller certified PFAS-free alternatives exist but are rarer and typically more expensive; conventional products dominate the market.

If you buy it

Store in a dry, cool location away from heat or direct sunlight to prevent plastic degradation. Do not expose to flame or high temperatures, as the plastic backing could degrade or off-gas. Replace every 4-8 hours or when saturated to prevent skin maceration and bacterial overgrowth. Dispose of used products in household waste (not down toilet) unless local guidelines specify otherwise.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Tena has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Incontinence Pads & Protection

Eco by Naty Incontinence Pads

Eco By Naty

Incontinence Pads

70GoodPFAS grade
  • Bamboo-derived viscose, cotton, plant-based absorbent core
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Heavy metals
Because Booster Pads

Because Market

Because Booster Pads

70GoodPFAS grade
  • Cellulose, superabsorbent polymer, cotton blend
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Absorbent material degradation and bacterial growth

2 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

5pcs Bamboo Charcoal Washable Incontinence Pads

5pcs Bamboo Charcoal Washable Incontinence Pads

70GoodPFAS grade
  • bamboo charcoal textile, washable cotton-blend absorbent layer
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Azo dyes and synthetic colorants

4 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

More incontinence pads & protection grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.