Klattermusen · Waterproof Winter Gloves
Klättermusen Fjalar Gloves
Pass until Fjallraven discloses water-repellent coating chemistry; wool gloves don't need PFAS-based repellency.
These wool-blend gloves feature a water-resistant finish, but Fjallraven won't disclose whether it uses PFAS-based or PFAS-free water-repellent coating. Wool doesn't inherently require fluorochemicals for water resistance.
The better-graded swap
Patagonia
Patagonia Synchilla Gloves
90/100 safety
Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
Wool blend with water-repellent coating water-resistant treatment (composition unspecified by Fjallraven)
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
You may also be interested in
Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.
- polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial growth in spent cartridges
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Aquasure
Premier Series 75 GPD Under Sink Reverse Osmosis Water Filtration System
- RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters
4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Avocado
Vegan Mattress
- organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Heavy metals
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
What Klättermusen Fjalar Gloves is made of, ingredients and materials
Klättermusen Fjalar gloves use a wool blend with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish applied to the outer surface. Fjallraven does not publicly specify the water-repellent coating chemistry, which is the primary safety concern for this product. Wool itself is a natural fiber with no established leaching or off-gassing hazards. The undisclosed water-repellent coating treatment is the variable that introduces potential PFAS or alternative chemical exposure, particularly if the gloves are heated, washed repeatedly, or worn against sensitive skin for extended periods.
What’s concerning
Category baseline
The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.
Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment
Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.
PFAS
Fjallraven does not publicly state whether the water-repellent coating treatment is PFAS-based, fluorocarbon-free, or an alternative chemistry. Wool gloves do not require fluorinated repellents for adequate water shedding, making PFAS use unnecessary but unconfirmed.
Source, ATSDR ↗Coating degradation and leaching during use
Water-repellent coating coatings on outdoor gear naturally degrade with washing and wear; as the coating breaks down, chemicals trapped in fibers may leach into skin contact. Wool-blend gloves are worn against bare skin, increasing contact exposure compared to outer shells.
Allergens or skin irritation from undisclosed additives
No documented skin reactions to Fjalar gloves on record. However, the wool blend may contain lanolin residue, synthetic dyes, or water-repellent coating byproducts that could trigger contact dermatitis in sensitive individuals; pre-washing in mild water is recommended.
What’s reassuring
Formaldehyde / VOCs
No recalls or reported cases of formaldehyde contamination in Klättermusen or Fjallraven wool gloves. Wool processing can involve formaldehyde-based shrink-proofing agents, but Fjallraven's sourcing standards and supplier practices are not publicly detailed.
Source, ATSDR ↗Azo dyes or synthetic dye contaminants
No specific test data or warnings on record for the Fjalar glove dyes. Fjallraven does not advertise azo-dye testing or restrictions; risk is low if the brand sources from established European mills, but unconfirmed.
How is this PFAS grade calculated?
The brand's record and disclosure
Fjallraven is a well-established Swedish outdoor brand with moderate sustainability messaging, but does not publicly disclose the specific chemistry of its water-repellent coating treatments across product lines. The brand has not issued recalls or public warnings related to chemical hazards in gloves. Fjallraven has not published independent test results or third-party certifications (such as Bluesign or GOTS) specifically for the Fjalar glove line, limiting external verification of chemical safety. Silence on water-repellent coating chemistry is common in the outdoor apparel industry but leaves end-users without clarity on PFAS or fluorocarbon use.
How it compares in its category
Winter wool-blend gloves with water-repellent coating coatings are typical in the mid-to-premium segment. Many competitors (including Patagonia, Arc'teryx, and Hestra) similarly do not fully disclose water-repellent coating chemistry on retail labels, though some offer PFAS-free or PFC-free product lines. Wool itself is not a material linked to antimony and flame retardant buildup, unlike synthetic polyester. The Fjalar glove's lack of transparency is not unusual for Fjallraven's price point, but puts it at parity with rather than ahead of category leaders on chemical disclosure.
If you buy it
Wash these gloves infrequently and by hand in cool water with mild detergent to preserve the water-repellent coating and minimize chemical leaching. Do not machine wash, dry clean, or expose to high heat, as water-repellent coating treatments can degrade and potentially release trapped chemicals. If the water repellency visibly deteriorates (water beading becomes flat pooling), the coating is compromised. Contact Fjallraven directly to request water-repellent coating chemistry disclosure before purchase if PFAS avoidance is a priority for your household.
What is not known about PFAS in this product?
- Basis
- Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
- Lab test
- None on record for this exact product
- Brand statement
- Klattermusen has made none
Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.
What are the PFAS-free alternatives to Klättermusen Fjalar Gloves?
- Polyester fleece (recycled)
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Heavy metals
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
- Yulex (synthetic rubber), neoprene-free alternative
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Allergic contact dermatitis (rubber/guayule sensitivity)
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
- Polyester fleece (Synchilla®); no water-repellent treatment disclosed
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Microplastics
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
More waterproof winter gloves grades
How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.