PFAS25/ 100Poor
Overall13/ 100Bad
Berkley Jensen Incontinence and Post Partum Bladder Control Pad

Berkley Jensen · Incontinence Pads & Protection

Berkley Jensen Incontinence and Post Partum Bladder Control Pad

Poor

Skip until manufacturer discloses waterproof coating composition.

Verdict · SkipPFAS waterproof backing is a major concern; no other acute hazards documented, but manufacturer silence on coating chemistry demands careful selection alternatives first.

Berkley Jensen incontinence pads use an unspecified waterproof backing, a common location for PFAS in absorbent hygiene products. Brand has not disclosed coating materials or made any PFAS claims.

The better-graded swap

Tranquility Personal Care Pads

Tranquility

Tranquility Personal Care Pads

70/100 safety

70Good

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Good.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

absorbent core with unspecified waterproof backing layer

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What Berkley Jensen Incontinence Control Pad is made of, ingredients and materials

Incontinence pads combine an absorbent core (typically wood pulp, superabsorbent polymers like sodium polyacrylate) with a waterproof backing layer. The backing's composition is the critical unknown here, it may be polyethylene, polypropylene, or a synthetic material with Teflon-type coating or fluorinated coatings to repel moisture. Since Berkley Jensen/Lillian does not publicly disclose this backing chemistry, you cannot verify whether PFAS or other synthetic water-repellent chemicals are present. This matters because the backing sits directly against skin for extended periods.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

75/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

PFAS

The unspecified waterproof backing may contain plasticizers, adhesives, or synthetic water-repellent compounds other than PFAS. Prolonged skin contact with undisclosed coating chemistry poses a risk, especially for post-partum users with compromised skin barriers.

Source, ATSDR ↗
70/ 100
⚠️

Superabsorbent polymer (SAP) skin irritation

Sodium polyacrylate cores can cause contact dermatitis or microabrasion if the pad is worn too long or if the user has sensitive skin. Post-partum and incontinent populations are at higher risk. No specific allergen data for this brand's SAP formulation is publicly available.

70/ 100
⚠️

Adhesive and fastening chemical exposure

Incontinence pad adhesives and elastic fasteners often contain acrylates, rubber compounds, or other tackifiers. Lillian does not disclose adhesive chemistry, creating uncertainty about potential skin sensitizers.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Microplastic or fragmentation risk from degraded backing

No documented cases of backing fragmentation or microplastic shedding in this product. However, poor disclosure of backing material durability makes it difficult to assess long-term integrity or shedding risk with extended wear.

95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Incontinence pads do not typically use formaldehyde-based binders, but resin-based adhesives in the fastening system could theoretically contain trace formaldehyde. No reported cases for this brand.

Source, ATSDR ↗
95/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

Lillian (the parent brand of Berkley Jensen) has no published safety certifications, material disclosure statements, or formal PFAS policy on record. The manufacturer has not responded to public inquiries about waterproof coating composition, which is a red flag for a product marketed for sensitive post-partum and incontinent skin. No recalls specific to this product line have been documented, but the absence of transparency is itself a disclosure failure.

How it compares in its category

Many incontinence pad brands (Depend, Always Discreet, Poise) now disclose their use of polyethylene or polypropylene backings without fluorinated additives, and some third-party certifications exist (e.g., dermatologist-tested claims). Berkley Jensen's silence puts it below market transparency standards. Budget incontinence pads often cut costs by using unspecified adhesives and backings, which increases the risk of undisclosed chemical content.

If you buy it

Do a 24-48 hour skin patch test on a non-sensitive area before regular use, especially post-partum when skin is compromised. Replace pads immediately if worn (do not extend wear time beyond package guidance) to minimize skin exposure and reduce any leaching risk. Store in a cool, dry place away from heat sources, as warmth can increase migration of chemicals from adhesives or backing into skin contact. If skin irritation, rash, or odor develops, discontinue and consider brands with transparent backing composition.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Berkley Jensen has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

What are the PFAS-free alternatives to Berkley Jensen Incontinence and Post Partum Bladder Control Pad?

Eco by Naty Incontinence Pads

Eco By Naty

Incontinence Pads

70GoodPFAS grade
  • Bamboo-derived viscose, cotton, plant-based absorbent core
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Heavy metals
Because Booster Pads

Because Market

Because Booster Pads

70GoodPFAS grade
  • Cellulose, superabsorbent polymer, cotton blend
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Absorbent material degradation and bacterial growth

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • bamboo charcoal textile, washable cotton-blend absorbent layer
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Azo dyes and synthetic colorants

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

More incontinence pads & protection grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.