PFAS25/ 100Poor
Overall0/ 100Bad
TotalDry Ultimate Incontinence Pads

TotalDry · Incontinence Pads & Protection

TotalDry Ultimate Incontinence Pads

Poor

Skip until brand discloses or third-party tests the waterproof layer.

Verdict · SkipPFAS concern in waterproof backing is primary issue; no other major hazards documented, but brand opacity demands caution and third-party verification before repurchase.

TotalDry Ultimate pads use a waterproof backing, a common application for PFAS coatings. Renfrew provides no material transparency or PFAS claims, and no public lab testing verifies safety.

The better-graded swap

Suprem Light Mini 220ml 12 Packs Per Carton

Lille

Suprem Light Mini 220ml 12 Packs Per Carton

70/100 safety

70Good

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Good.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Likely absorbent core (SAP/cellulose) with unspecified waterproof backing layer

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What TotalDry Ultimate Incontinence Pads is made of, ingredients and materials

TotalDry Ultimate pads likely use a superabsorbent polymer (SAP) core combined with cellulose fluff for liquid absorption, topped with a waterproof backing layer of unspecified composition. The backing is the critical unknown, it may contain PFAS (fluorinated compounds that repel moisture and oil) or alternative polymers like polyethylene. SAP itself is generally recognized as low concern for skin contact, but the backing's chemical identity directly determines whether long-term skin and systemic exposure poses a concern.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

75/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Waterproof backings in incontinence pads commonly use PFAS compounds for water repellency. Renfrew's refusal to disclose or test suggests possible presence; no independent test results are available for this product.

Source, ATSDR ↗
20/ 100
🍳

Skin irritation from adhesives or coating residues

Incontinence pads use pressure-sensitive adhesives and antimicrobial coatings whose specific chemistry is typically proprietary. Long-term skin contact (especially in warm, moist conditions) can trigger contact dermatitis in sensitive individuals if irritants are present.

70/ 100
⏳

Polymer degradation and leaching from moisture or heat exposure

SAP and polyethylene backings can degrade under sustained humidity or high temperature, potentially releasing monomers or oligomers. Improper storage (e.g., damp bathrooms, direct sunlight) accelerates this risk.

70/ 100
🫧

Microplastic migration from pad disintegration

Repeated flexing, moisture, and temperature cycling can break down cellulose and SAP particles. While ingestion risk is low, inhalation of dust particles during pad removal and disposal is a minor concern in poorly ventilated spaces.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No public evidence that TotalDry uses formaldehyde-releasing preservatives, but antimicrobial coatings are common in this category and rarely disclosed. Request ingredient list from manufacturer if odor control claims are made.

Source, ATSDR ↗
95/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

Renfrew has not publicly disclosed the chemical composition of the waterproof backing or stated a position on PFAS use in this product line. No third-party certifications (such as bluesign, Oeko-Tex, or similar) are listed on available product packaging or materials. The absence of transparency is notable in a category where some competitors (particularly European and premium brands) have begun disclosing PFAS-free formulations or undergoing independent testing.

How it compares in its category

Most mainstream incontinence pad brands remain silent on PFAS, making TotalDry typical rather than exceptional in disclosure standards. However, some competitors (e.g., certain Tena, Depend, and store-brand alternatives) have responded to consumer pressure by publishing PFAS test results or switching to PFAS-free backings. TotalDry's lack of any public commitment places it in the middle tier of the market in terms of chemical transparency.

If you buy it

Monitor your skin for irritation, rash, or persistent itching, which might suggest a reaction to backing chemicals or adhesives. Store pads in a cool, dry place away from direct heat and sunlight, as moisture and warmth can degrade polymer layers and potentially increase leaching. Replace pads every 2-3 hours during use to minimize prolonged skin contact. Given the PFAS uncertainty, consider requesting a safety data sheet from Renfrew or switching to a brand with published PFAS-free testing if affordable.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 42% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
TotalDry has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

What are the PFAS-free alternatives to TotalDry Ultimate Incontinence Pads?

Eco by Naty Incontinence Pads

Eco By Naty

Incontinence Pads

70GoodPFAS grade
  • Bamboo-derived viscose, cotton, plant-based absorbent core
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Heavy metals
Because Booster Pads

Because Market

Because Booster Pads

70GoodPFAS grade
  • Cellulose, superabsorbent polymer, cotton blend
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Absorbent material degradation and bacterial growth

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • bamboo charcoal textile, washable cotton-blend absorbent layer
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Azo dyes and synthetic colorants

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

More incontinence pads & protection grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.