PFAS25/ 100Poor
Overall0/ 100Bad
TENA Women's Ultimate Pads

Tena · Incontinence Pads & Protection

TENA Women's Ultimate Pads

Poor

High risk; skip until Tena discloses coating chemistry, waterproof pads commonly use PFAS-based water-repellent coating.

Verdict · SkipHigh PFAS risk from undisclosed waterproof coating outweighs low concern for other contaminants; use only if no PFAS-transparent alternative available.

These pads use a waterproof backing layer but provide no public disclosure of the coating chemistry. Waterproofing frequently relies on PFAS treatments, though alternatives exist.

The better-graded swap

CVS Women's Protective Pads Moderate Absorbency

CVS Health

CVS Women's Protective Pads Moderate Absorbency

70/100 safety

70Good

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Good.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Cellulose/nonwoven blend with unspecified waterproof coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What TENA Women's Ultimate Pads is made of, ingredients and materials

TENA Ultimate Pads use a cellulose-nonwoven blend core designed for absorbency, with an unspecified waterproof backing layer (the typical source of PFAS in incontinence products). The cellulose itself is a low-hazard natural material, but the coating chemistry remains proprietary. Without disclosure of the waterproof agent (fluorochemical, polyurethane, or other), the safety profile cannot be fully assessed. This opacity is the primary safety concern.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

75/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

PFAS

The waterproof backing layer in incontinence pads typically relies on fluorochemical-based durable water repellents or legacy PFAS; Tena's silence on this is consistent with industry practice but raises high concern for PFOA/PFOS or replacement PFAS.

Source, ATSDR ↗
20/ 100
⏳

Skin irritation from coating degradation or contact

Over time or with heat, unknown waterproof coatings can degrade and release irritant compounds; direct prolonged skin contact with any unidentified polymer backing increases risk in sensitive individuals or with incontinence-associated dermatitis already present.

70/ 100
🫧

Microplastics

The nonwoven synthetic fiber layer may shed microparticles if mechanically damaged or during disposal; this is not unique to Tena but is an inherent property of petroleum-based absorbent hygiene products.

Source, EPA ↗
70/ 100
⚠️

Bacterial contamination or mold growth if stored improperly

Cellulose-based absorbent materials can harbor bacterial or fungal growth if exposed to moisture or high humidity before use; this is a storage/handling risk rather than a manufacturing defect, but relevant to proper use conditions.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No recalls or reports document formaldehyde-releasing finishes in TENA Ultimate Pads; cellulose and nonwoven textiles can be treated with formaldehyde resins for antimicrobial or stiffening effects, but Tena does not appear to market this product with such claims.

Source, ATSDR ↗
95/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

Tena, owned by SCA (Essity), has not publicly committed to PFAS phase-out or disclosed waterproof coating chemistry for this product line as of available records. The brand has faced pressure on sustainability but maintains silence on specific PFAS "forever chemicals" used in absorbent hygiene products. No major product recalls specific to this pad have been documented, but lack of transparency on PFAS is a known industry-wide pattern that Tena has not broken.

How it compares in its category

Most incontinence pads (Depend, Always Discreet, Poise) use similar cellulose-nonwoven cores with proprietary waterproof backings; few brands disclose coating composition publicly. Products explicitly marketed as PFAS-free or using polyurethane-based waterproofing exist (e.g., some European medical-grade alternatives), but are less available in mass retail. Tena's position is typical for mainstream brands, meaning the PFAS concern is category-wide but not uniquely worse here.

If you buy it

Change pads regularly (per manufacturer guidance, typically every 2-4 hours) to minimize skin contact with any leached compounds and reduce odor/bacterial growth. Store in a cool, dry place away from direct sunlight to prevent accelerated degradation of the coating. Do not wash and reuse; these are single-use products. If you have sensitive skin or concerns about chemical exposure, request PFAS disclosure from Tena directly, or consider switching to a brand with transparent waterproof material chemistry.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Tena has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

What are the PFAS-free alternatives to TENA Women's Ultimate Pads?

Eco by Naty Incontinence Pads

Eco By Naty

Incontinence Pads

70GoodPFAS grade
  • Bamboo-derived viscose, cotton, plant-based absorbent core
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Heavy metals
Because Booster Pads

Because Market

Because Booster Pads

70GoodPFAS grade
  • Cellulose, superabsorbent polymer, cotton blend
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Absorbent material degradation and bacterial growth

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • bamboo charcoal textile, washable cotton-blend absorbent layer
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Azo dyes and synthetic colorants

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

More incontinence pads & protection grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.